Maybe, or the two share the 2nd PP unit.Chicago says no.
He’s beating out Korchinski for the 2nd PP slot?
Habs rolled all season with 3 goalies because they didnt wanna risk losing Primeau to waivers so im pretty sure Barron will be in Montreal all season unless he gets traded of course but he will play over Kovacevic and Mailloux,Reinbacher will remain in Laval no need to rush them they arent ready yetHabs fans scoffing at this are crazy. Barron loses waiver exemption this summer, they have no roster spots opening up from UFA's on their blue line, and he's not even their first call up with the way Mailloux has played. Nobody is going to offer a 2nd for him let alone Chicago's 34th OA.
I don't get this point of view... a very high 2nd isn't a "low pick", it's a pretty damn high one. I mean, Barron was initially picked at #25, and I don't think his progress merits getting back a pick in anything like the same range, and that includes the first half of the 2nd.Habs rolled all season with 3 goalies because they didnt wanna risk losing Primeau to waivers so im pretty sure Barron will be in Montreal all season unless he gets traded of course but he will play over Kovacevic and Mailloux,Reinbacher will remain in Laval no need to rush them they arent ready yet
Has for his value i think Barron took a step back this season but a 2nd is fair for him but we should keep him and hope he bounces back we have enough low picks
Habs fans scoffing at this are crazy. Barron loses waiver exemption this summer, they have no roster spots opening up from UFA's on their blue line, and he's not even their first call up with the way Mailloux has played. Nobody is going to offer a 2nd for him let alone Chicago's 34th OA.
you trade rd for rd because of needWe need Barron more than we need a 2nd round pick, unless we really like a guy at 34.
Ideally, if he's traded, it's in a package for a young RD or RW which are our needs right now.
He stated as part of a packageyou trade rd for rd because of need
you trade rd for rd because of need
There is a massive difference here. Montreal views Primeau as their future starter. That is worth using a roster spot on. Hanging on to Barron to be your 3rd or 4th best RD down the line is foolish.Habs rolled all season with 3 goalies because they didnt wanna risk losing Primeau to waivers so im pretty sure Barron will be in Montreal all season unless he gets traded of course but he will play over Kovacevic and Mailloux,Reinbacher will remain in Laval no need to rush them they arent ready yet
Has for his value i think Barron took a step back this season but a 2nd is fair for him but we should keep him and hope he bounces back we have enough low picks
I want to say this is harsh, but looking for waiver-eligible players who couldn't stay on their current teams for whatever reason, and couldn't find any examples worth more than a 4th, so a 5th can't be too far off-base.Nobody is giving you a 2nd for Barron lol. His trade value is about a 5th right now which is why you just keep him and hope for improvement
I'm also using a very recent example of Okhotiuk as a base. Similar caliber player traded for a 5th just a month ago and only 1 year older.I want to say this is harsh, but looking for waiver-eligible players who couldn't stay on their current teams for whatever reason, and couldn't find any examples worth more than a 4th, so a 5th can't be too far off-base.
Good comparable. I figure that's his value in a year if Montreal grows weary of his lack of progress and he isn't getting into many games as a defensively suspect 8th D.I'm also using a very recent example of Okhotiuk as a base. Similar caliber player traded for a 5th just a month ago and only 1 year older.
I don't believe that the management team that had nothing to do with drafting Primeau , decided to keep him in the NHL on a three goalie rotation right up to the deadline rather than chance losing him to waivers are now willing to trade a 22 year old , big , smooth skating , right shot defenseman with a ton of upside that they specifically targeted for a second round pick . The only way Barron moves is in a bigger deal for a top six forward .I guess Chicago will like to speed up the rebuild a bit since they have Bebard.
Let's say CHI gets either of Celibrini or Demidov , probably end up with a other high end forward.
But you sure need defense in the game as well.
MTL : Barron
for
CHI : CHI 2nd rd pick 2024 (#34)
Barron is NHL ready and would be a decent add to CHI right side.
MTL can spare Barron with all the coming up prospect and gets a great pick.
then the + must be a better asset than barron.Barron+ for a better RD, yes.
We currently have no mid/long term NHL RD. Savard is likely gone by TDL and maybe Kovacevic too.
Reinbacher and Mailloux are looking good, but they are probably not NHL ready yet.
Our young D are mostly LDs: Guhle, Xhekaj, Struble, Harris, Hutson, Engstrom...
I just don’t see Chicago offering pick number 34 for Barron. They can add whoever they feel is the best pick for them at that spot in the draft.Ok let's turn this around to put things in perspective.
Let's say CHI want a young RHD (24 and younger) ready to play next year behind Jones.
They will offer #34 for him.
Who do you think they can land with that pick ?
My ask is found one for that pick ??I just don’t see Chicago offering pick number 34 for Barron. They can add whoever they feel is the best pick for them at that spot in the draft.
Found what for that pick?My ask is found one for that pick ??
Value is fair but thesis is off. Why does Montreal want to get younger? They already are so young.I guess Chicago will like to speed up the rebuild a bit since they have Bebard.
Let's say CHI gets either of Celibrini or Demidov , probably end up with a other high end forward.
But you sure need defense in the game as well.
MTL : Barron
for
CHI : CHI 2nd rd pick 2024 (#34)
Barron is NHL ready and would be a decent add to CHI right side.
MTL can spare Barron with all the coming up prospect and gets a great pick.
Who do you think you can get for #34 as a RHD under 25 years old ?Found what for that pick?
Not trying to be a smart ass or nothing just not sure what you mean with your previous post?
Never said we could. I don’t see the Blackhawks interested in Barron at the price of that pick.Who do you think you can get for #34 as a RHD under 25 years old ?