He one of the many that think Mrazek is better out of the box.
He's a better puck handler, I'll give them that. But you don't replace a top 10-15 goaltender because you think that rookie over there "looks" better.
Howard isn't flashy. Sometimes looks a little unorthodox. Can you argue the results? Excluding his sophomore year, which he should get a pass (all of the pros do, why not Howard?), he's put up .920+ 3 out of 4 years. He's on pace to do it again!
I'm sorry, Mrazek may have potential...but he's not better than Howard at the NHL level right NOW. It's possible that he never will, outside his puck handling abilities.
Howard is a damn fine goalie, and I'm face palm every time I see someone wanting to get rid of him for Mrazek. No thanks. If the kid can play 60+ games year in and year out at the NHL level...be a work horse when called upon (something Howard can do)..and get results (also something HOward can do) with that kind of work load, then we'll talk. For now, Howard all the way.
Edit: I will say, I'm also high on Mrazek. But I do think it's silly talk to get rid of Howard for him now, or next year...just on a few NHL level games. AHL is a totally different beast all together (not near as competitive...obviously)