So the rumors are he offers up a similar (but slightly higher due to taxes) contract to Williams, but because he chose to play with stars like OV and to live closer to where his wife is from and wants to live so he didn't do a good enough job? In those 4 years what other holes has he had to deal with?
Well in terms of impact players (Top-6 F, Top-4 D) he's added 1 in 4 years, Petry. So the number of holes he's dealt with aren't very numerous.
Look, MB has a major issue to deal with in the scoring depth of our top 9 but he has dealt with other issues of depth and cap management. Right now, he has the pieces in place and the cap space to get that "missing piece" . Semin isn't really panning out right now, but for a contract that has zero impact on the team, and he may still turn it around (and be a 15G guy??...3rd liner??). but let's be honest, this team is better now than 4 seasons ago. Our top players have developped well, and are responding to being allowed to play a more open style. Is the coaching an issue? I couldn't argue that one, but on the players we have and the cap management, MB has done a very good job.
Is the team better, absolutely, but really how much of that is due to Bergevin and how much would have happened no matter what. Subban would have become a star no matter what. I doubt Gallagher would be much different either. Most analysts point out the Olympics being a turning point for Price being dominant. When you look at what Bergevin has done it's really not a lot, which is why most will talk about the culture he brought since it's something that is completely subjective and can't be measured.
Being a contender means you CONTEND with the top teams in the league. You brought up last season (stated we were contenders) when we had a horrible GF.....Now your argument is we have a great GF this season so are a contender.
We don't have a great top 6, it's clear.....We will need one to be a TRUE CONTENDER....not just get through a round or two come playoff time.
Our bottom 6 is scoring, if you think the rate they are scoring is sustainable, your wrong. When they slow down, I will come back and ask you if you think our top 6 needs help.
So how did we end up being 4th overall in the league last year if we couldn't contend with the top teams in the league?
And for the record, Price's record vs the 5 best teams last year by win% was 5-6-2. So we were contending with the top teams despite our horrible GF. You seem to be saying the only thing that matters is the top-6, that's wrong. Goaltending and defence matter as much if not more than the top-6, and we are the best in those areas.
Our weakness in the top-6 is more than compensated by our great goaltending and defence. That's what you don't seem to understand, EVERY team has room for improvement if it's not in the top-6 it's elsewhere in their lineup.
And let's look at how many goals some contender's top-6 have scored
Chi: 25
NYR: 24
Pit: 15
TBL: 18
LA: 23
Montreal's top-6 is at 24.