yes, him and ron francis, both premium point collectors with 1756 and 1731 regular season games played respectively. not that he wasn't a good player but he never took hartford to the sky when he was the first line center there ...
oh, but the 'intangibles' ...
I'll agree with the guy that said Trottier, not a bad player, but certainly overrated. Older posters will use whatever excuse they want to make sure Trottier ranks above Joe Sakic on all time lists, like Trottier's defence is better and he was more physical, therefore he's still 'better'. Hogwash, Joe Sakic surpassed him years ago in accomplishments. Durability in regular season and superior playoff resume is much more important than being 10% better defensively.
Same with Bobby Clarke and Guy Lafluer, how can anyone say with an unbiased eye that thier careers are better than Joe's. Not only does Sakic dwarf Guy in longevity and defensive play, his 2001 season is arguably better than any season lafluer ever had. Scoring 118 points and shutting down the other teams top lines, Lafluer could only dream of doing that.
What number would you rank Richard at?
Alex Daigle.
/thread
Messier and Francis point collectors? Good grief. They brought far more to the table than their point totals, this should be incredibly obvious even to a Messier-hater like you. That you're blaming Francis for not taking the sad-sack Whalers further in the playoffs is equally laughable. The only run of respectability Hartford ever put together occured during Francis' tenure there. As soon as he was traded away the franchise went into a downward spiral and never recovered, moving to Carolina eventually.
Pavel Bure.
"One of the greatest Russians to ever play" my ass.
can't say i hate hockey players. i'm not 12. but i would say messier is overrated, by some. others sees him in a more accurate light.
the fact that he only scored one 50 goals season [and not 50+]. and that was early in the 80's when he played some wing on gretzky [the year gretzky scored 92]
the fact that he was a mediocre skater. or that he, when he was at his best in edmonton, placed 4th in ppg on his team, behind gretzky, kurri, and coffey.
or the fact that he made much of his way with cheap shots and bullying [particularly on players smaller than himself] ...
the fact that he played on power house's and never was the top producer on them [not even in new york or post-gretzky edmonton ... i mean brian leetch, and craig simpson!]
... with that logic, sure, henri richard has 11 cups. he must be 5 times the better player than mario lemieux then, who only has 2 cups?. if we're into cup counting here ...
wow, did you ever see him play when he was at his best?
the kid was dynomite!, he scored 60, 60, 59, 58, 51 goals seasons in the nhl. every season in the nhl when he played over 65 games he scored over 50 goals. the bolded ones came when the dead puck era was at its deadest, on a florida panthers team having viktor kozlov|rob niedermayer as the first line center ...
bure never had an adam oates, mario lemieux, wayne gretzky, peter forsberg playmaker on his side. he created his own plays [as opposed to brett hull or kevin stevens, for example] alongside greg adams, murray craven, trevor linden, viktor kozlov, ray whitney ... not absolutely terrible, but in comparison
who else scores 5 goals in an olympic semi final 7-4 win?
if you say bure's overrated please develop the point ... if you're trying to make one?
can't say i hate hockey players. i'm not 12. but i would say messier is overrated, by some. others sees him in a more accurate light.
the fact that he only scored one 50 goals season [and not 50+]. and that was early in the 80's when he played some wing on gretzky [the year gretzky scored 92]
the fact that he was a mediocre skater. or that he, when he was at his best in edmonton, placed 4th in ppg on his team, behind gretzky, kurri, and coffey.
or the fact that he made much of his way with cheap shots and bullying [particularly on players smaller than himself] ...
the fact that he played on power house's and never was the top producer on them [not even in new york or post-gretzky edmonton ... i mean brian leetch, and craig simpson!]
... with that logic, sure, henri richard has 11 cups. he must be 5 times the better player than mario lemieux then, who only has 2 cups?. if we're into cup counting here ...
Didn't see his great early Calgary and Toronto days, but it seems to me like Lanny Mcdonald is an over rated player. Am I wrong?
You must be thinking of some other Messier if you think he was a mediocre skater.
Or you could have vision problems.
Pavel Bure.
"One of the greatest Russians to ever play" my ass.
How the hell can ANYONE say Bure is overrated. Saying Bure is overrated would be the same as saying Ovechkin is overrated. Theyre both ****ing AMAZING.
A real overrated player though, is Mike Modano...
A mod should make a sticky post describing exactly what the word "overrated" means. I think it would help a lot of people out, who seem to confuse it with "bad". A player can be both excellent, and overrated.
Example:
I think Maurice Richard is overrated by many. I also think he's one of the top-10 forwards to ever play. These things are not mutually exclusive.
I think he's only overrated by the casual fans that think exciting goals are worth twice as much as garbage goals.
Ron Francis is overrated. He was never a top guy.
Pavel Datsyuk is overrated. Playoff performances really hurt him.
Jeremy Roenick is overrated. Gets a lot of attention for his personality. Personality goes a long way, tho. Just ask Crosby.
Jari Kurri is overrated. He should be renamed Greztky's partner.
Wayne Gretzky.
Here's why.
In my opinion he's 6th greatest all time, maybe 5th.
However in the NHL in general he is hyped up to be THE BEST and I mean THE ABSOLUTE BEST.
He got his number retired BY THE WHOLE LEAGUE, I mean Jordan and Chamberlain didn't have that happen to them in the NBA.
But no, and every time you have a Top 20 or Top 10 list the broadcasters are talking about all the greats up until #2 and then at #1 they say " and of course Gretzky is #1 ".
He's one of the best ever no question but the general cencus seems to be he's 5 times better than #2 and NOBODY can argue with that.
Orr and Mario are by far MUCH better than Gretz so really it's always pissed me off.
That's just it, I still put Gretz in the Top 10 players of all time ( when you include goalies ) and #6/#5 in terms of greatest skaters.
I still give him cred.
But I just can't understand his reasoning as being as Bettman himself stated " the amabssador of hockey ".
I mean, like seriously what? WHAT?
Compare Lemieux and Gretz, please, and I hate the Penguins I even bet they'd lose in the 2nd round, but Lemieux was a God, period.
I don't look at career stats, which is what Gretz and Howe had, I look at goal scoring machines, those are the best forwards of all time and Gretz benefited GREATLY from his protection and amazing lineup.
Not many players from Lemieux's lineups were great without him.
Without Gretzky, Coffey was still golden, many players with great stats who played with Gretzky, well, they didn't play anywhere else, the core lineups and players were kept, unlike say in Pittsburgh where Mario was always top notch.
Richard, he was just a God, he was better than Gretzky, look at his goal scoring in his day he finished with GPG of .556 that's amazing, he finished with more career goals than points, that's blistering.
Bossy is questionable that's why I always say Gretz is my 6th/5th because the Bossy factor, just in my opinion I think he was the better goal scorer, he wasn't protected as much.
With all the over/underated threads I thought I would continue the trend..
So who do you think the most overrated forward of all-time is?
I know people aren't going to agree but I think Steve Yzerman is overated he never had 100+ points after 1993. Don't get me wrong Yzerman was a great player and an excellent captain but when it comes to greatest players of all-time Yzerman does not make my top 20.