Speculation: Most disappointing 2020 draft result?

[TheDebater]

There is obviously a ton of discussion surrounding the 3rd and 5th overall picks, mostly regarding who we would want at either draft soot with most people generally satisfied with any combination of Byfield/Stutzle and then one of the other top ranked players at 5. However;

What realistic result in your opinion would lead to complete disappointment for you on draft night? List the combination of players that Dorion would potentially select at 3 and 5 that would leave you absolutely feeling disappointed:

For me, I would be disappointed with a Drysdale/Perfetti combo.

Feel free to list more than one combo.

Click to read more...

 

[Leafmealone11]

There is obviously a ton of discussion surrounding the 3rd and 5th overall picks, mostly regarding who we would want at either draft soot with most people generally satisfied with any combination of Byfield/Stutzle and then one of the other top ranked players at 5. However;

What realistic result in your opinion would lead to complete disappointment for you on draft night? List the combination of players that Dorion would potentially select at 3 and 5 that would leave you absolutely feeling disappointed:

For me, I would be disappointed with a Drysdale/Perfetti combo.

Feel free to list more than one combo.

It is good to have high draft picks but 3 and 5 are scary for the hit/miss factor. It’s no secret who they want at 3 it’s basically up to LA who the sens get so five is the only real debate.
I hope it’s not Drysdale

 

[Taluss]

I won’t be annoyed at Stutzle or Byfield. So let’s say realistic offers for 5. Id pick like this:
Want: Raymond
Happy with: Drysdale, Rossi
Iffy about but wouldn’t be annoyed: Sanderson, Perfetti
Unhappy: Quinn, no doubt he will be a stud but better options imo

 

[BondraTime]

Most disappointed with from options I’d be fine with:
3. Byfield (rather Stutzle, extremely happy with Byfield)
5. Rossi

Most disappointed from options I don’t see as realistic:
3. Anyone aside from Byfield or Stutzle
5.Quinn

 

[PatrickEaves]

Perfetti and Rossi.
One will be a bust, and the other will be a non-impact NHL'er.

 

[Stylizer1]

Mathieu Chouinard

 

[TheDebater]

Oddly enough, after thinking about my selection in the original post, I realized that a haul of Drysdale/Perfetti would be disappointing short term but if both hit their potential it would easily make it a successful draft.

My biggest disappointment I suppose, would be drafting Askarov at #5, as I do not think a goalie is necessary right now regardless how good. Slightly less disappointed would be Quinn or Sanderson for me.

I really want one of Raymond or Rossi at this point (or Perfetti IF we select Byfield or Stutzle.

 

[Sens of Anarchy]

I'll be disappointed if we dont get one of Rossi, Raymond, Perfetti, Drysdale, Sanderson at 5. So pretty easy to please.
They won't move off Byfield/Stutzle at 3

 

[NyQuil]

I guess I would be scratching my head if we drafted Drysdale and Sanderson.

 

[mikeymac]

Sanderson at 3.
I give it a realistic chance if happening unfortunately.

 

[BondraTime]

Sanderson at 3.
I give it a realistic chance if happening unfortunately.

Pierre's conference today tells us everyone knows what we are doing at 3, so it's either Byfield or Stutzle it seems

 

[Boud]

Sanderson at 3.
I give it a realistic chance if happening unfortunately.

How so

 

[Sweatred]

Sanderson / Rossi

 

[BloodRedArmy]

Mathieu Chouinard

Third time's a charm!

 

[BloodRedArmy]

Pierre's conference today tells us everyone knows what we are doing at 3, so it's either Byfield or Stutzle it seems

While I do believe we are taking whichever one LA doesn't, it's not impossible that PD is posturing. Maybe Detroit desperately wants one or the other and Ottawa is actually after, say, Drysdale. Obviously you imply you're taking one so that you gain leverage.

 

[Sens of Anarchy]

How so

 

[TheDebater]

Maybe he thinks that there is a chance Lafreniere drops to #3

 

[Sens of Anarchy]

Maybe he thinks that there is a chance Lafreniere drops to #3

 

[TheDebater]

Wait, how did you get a picture of my girlfriend?

 

[GCK]

I’d be disappointed with anyone but Perfetti, Raymond or Quinn at 5.

I could eventually come to terms with Sanderson, Rossi, Holtz or Drysdale.

I’d be angry with Askarov or Lundell

 

[Tuna99]

Be disappointed if picks 3 & 5 aren’t about offence and PP. They need PP players and this is a chance to get 2 elite starters and build a top NHL PP with Chabot, Tkachuk, Brannstrom.

 

[Artanis]

I think i'd be disappointed with picks that're really off the board (Lundell/Quin) wouldn't mind Askarov to a degree though.

 

[Flamingo]

This is fun. It reminds me of that SNL skit with John Lovitz and Dana Carvey where they’d ask each other if they’d experienced various masochistic acts.

Assuming the only latitude is at 5, Drysdale or Perfetti. Or Quinn, since a few think that’s a possibility.

 

[stempniaksen]

There's no disappointing choice at #3.

I wouldn't be happy with any of Sanderson, Quinn or Askarov at #5 given they'd be leaving (much) better options on the table, imo.

 

[Peptic Balcers]

Sandersons going to have a great NHL career, but he’s not a top 5 talent in this draft