McSendy
Registered User
- Nov 29, 2017
- 59
- 107
Simple question. We all know the different paths these two have taken since the 2016 draft. What happens this year?
I predicted before they played in the NHL that Puljujarvi would turn out to be a better player. Didn't look too good at first. Now I think there's a chance it'll happen.
I mean Pulju has a decent way to go to catch Laine and his career so far.I predicted before they played in the NHL that Puljujarvi would turn out to be a better player. Didn't look too good at first. Now I think there's a chance it'll happen.
I mean Pulju has a decent way to go to catch Laine and his career so far.
Well they were neck and neck leading up to the draft so that isn't too bold - now Puljujarvi has a long way to catch up though
Puljujarvi has 62 career points. Laine has 3 seasons where he scored more than 62 points.
Remember when Ty Rattie looked amazing on McDavid's wing for a preseason game and Oilers fans were penciling him in for 30 goals? I sure do. The answer to this is Laine far and away. Probably double. Potentially triple.In Laine’s best season he paced for 76 points. Puljaarvi’s best is a 37 point pace.
I understand the optimism of some Oiler fans that he can have a breakout season playing with McDavid but until proven otherwise the answer is Laine.
Remember when Ty Rattie looked amazing on McDavid's wing for a preseason game and Oilers fans were penciling him in for 30 goals? I sure do. The answer to this is Laine far and away. Probably double. Potentially triple.
The thread is about points production not whether a player is a good player or not.From these comments you can clearly tell who saw Pulju playing last year and who didn't. He's the real deal.
From these comments you can clearly tell who saw Pulju playing last year and who didn't. He's the real deal.
Why can't he be good at both. That said, we aren't comparing his video game career to his hockey career. We are comparing Pulj to Laine and I think Laine is better at both.I think Laine is better at video games than he is at hockey nowadays
Maybe if hf boards gets an esports pageWhy can't he be good at both. That said, we aren't comparing his video game career to his hockey career. We are comparing Pulj to Laine and I think Laine is better at both.
Agreed with most, points wise Laine will probably still be higher, the Jets can surround him with enough playmakers and the right system on his line for him to hammer pucks since that still appears to be his bread and butter.
Puljujarvi would be the more versatile scorer (can score off the rush or use his size down low for jam plays and tips) and he'll be the better all-around winger but since you asked points it's probably still Laine (unless he and Hyman get tons of assists for Connor's goals).