I think the Jets should of been better more than the Moose should of been better.
Yes, but when your pipeline is looking to use these young players, then any stagnation is seen as a bad thing. When it's a concerted stagnation amongst all your young rookies, then there might be a problem. PMo is not a problem on the Jets. Look at the PK from the last 2 months of the season vs the rest of the time. It performed a decent clip above league average.
Also, this thread is about the Moose, not the Jets. Don't try to change the subject.
See I dont get this. Why not manage the story? He had a disagreement with the way t kings were handled or maybe his players weren't developing (they arent) as good as they should. In this vacuum of information nothing good can come out of it.
How often do we find out the reason behind any firings and hirings? Some are self evident (most every coach firing is), but if there's more to the situation, as it seems to be the case here, there is probably little good to come out of explaining why something like this happened. TNSE won't throw him under the bus, and I doubt McCambridge would do the same. Leave on amiable terms, because the hockey world is very small.