Proposal: Montreal - Colorado

Discussion in 'Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk' started by BigHabs, Feb 11, 2019 at 10:45 PM.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. BigHabs

    BigHabs #11

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    6,088
    Likes Received:
    136
    Trophy Points:
    81
    :habs

    Artturi Lehkonen
    Mike Reilly
    2nd round pick

    :avs

    Samuel Girard
    Colin Wilson
     
  2. Steve Varlamov

    Steve Varlamov Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2013
    Messages:
    1,706
    Likes Received:
    853
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Occupation:
    Business Boy
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    It’s actually gotta hurt if you’re trying to get Girard.
     
    YP44 likes this.
  3. MasterMatt25

    MasterMatt25 Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2014
    Messages:
    2,210
    Likes Received:
    879
    Trophy Points:
    104
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Montreal
    Awful for Colorado
     
  4. A Loyal Dog

    A Loyal Dog Woof! Sponsor

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2016
    Messages:
    3,685
    Likes Received:
    932
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Occupation:
    Housedog
    Location:
    Marc Bergevin's Ass
    :habs
    Alex DeBrincat
    Samuel Girard

    :hawks
    Andrew Shaw


    Oops.

    Also, no way Girard goes for that crap package. You need to add lots.
     
    mariolemieux66 and GOiler36 like this.
  5. BigHabs

    BigHabs #11

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    6,088
    Likes Received:
    136
    Trophy Points:
    81
    You guys are acting like Lehkonen is garbage.

    Am I missing something here? I get Girard is a good defenseman as well. But you guys are writing off Lehkonen as a 4th liner.

    The guy wears the “A” in Montreal. He is a relied upon main PKer. Is on track to put up good offensive numbers this season topping his career high.

    I feel it’s not bad like you guys are posting. Lehkonen brings a bit of everything to the table. He has high value as well.
     
    TooLegitToQuit likes this.
  6. HOPE

    HOPE Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2011
    Messages:
    4,348
    Likes Received:
    1,915
    Trophy Points:
    126
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Montreal
    girard is much more valuable than lehkonen...
     
  7. BabyPanda

    BabyPanda Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2018
    Messages:
    1,164
    Likes Received:
    805
    Trophy Points:
    82
    Gender:
    Male
    Samuel Girard is overrated and has poor underlying numbers. We don't want anyone from Colorado's losing streak? :sarcasm:

    Seriously though, he's 20 and is already a top 4 guy I believe. Great potential to be a 3/4, wouldn't be surprised if he's a 1/2. I'm not sold on him being a top pairing guy in the future but it has been almost a year since I watched him last and I could very likely be 100 percent wrong.

    As far as fits go, I don't think he's it for Montreal. His price is high and something about him seems that he just is a better fit with Colorado (not knocking him, he just seems like a perfect fit for that team, he seems like he's meant to be a core player there).

    My gut would tell MB to stay away from this trade just because cost and that I prefer we find someone a couple years further along in their development (Habs competing in 2-3 years would have Girard still in his pre prime age )
     
  8. BabyPanda

    BabyPanda Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2018
    Messages:
    1,164
    Likes Received:
    805
    Trophy Points:
    82
    Gender:
    Male
    Lehkonen is great but he's not anything special. He's a solid middle 6 two way player and will serve well on Montreal for years, he's not worth other teams spending a lot to get and not worth Montreal acquiring those assets to love him. He's the type of player who's too good to lose but not good enough to move (whereas a guy like Hamilton is too good not to move and not good enough to keep)
     
  9. Avs44

    Avs44 Registered User

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    18,007
    Likes Received:
    3,109
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Gender:
    Male
    You're not offering anything the Avs have a pressing need for, especially compared to what Girard could be and the vital role he could fulfill as a top four defensman on a weak defense. You didn't really account for the Avs' needs whatsoever, which pretty much always makes for a very easy rejection.
     
  10. MasterMatt25

    MasterMatt25 Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2014
    Messages:
    2,210
    Likes Received:
    879
    Trophy Points:
    104
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Montreal
    Nothing wrong with Lehkonen. But Girard is wayyy more valuable
     
    Mac Attack and Meeqs like this.
  11. Pierre Lebrun

    Pierre Lebrun Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2014
    Messages:
    1,158
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Agreed. I also think he's a Claude favorite and is really unlikely to be moved.
     
  12. Muffin

    Muffin Avalanche Flavoured

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2009
    Messages:
    4,668
    Likes Received:
    896
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Location:
    Edmonton
    You know you have a bad proposal when you need to add a 2nd round pick to "even" out the trade.
    Counter proposal: Calvert, Nemeth, 2nd for Drouin. Calvert is a good pker that coaches love, so I think it's a fair trade.
     
    MacBradley, Barklez and CobraAcesS like this.
  13. koyvoo

    koyvoo unsustainable

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2014
    Messages:
    5,540
    Likes Received:
    4,688
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Damn. I’d love for the Habs to get Girard for that price.

    C’mon Avs. Be nice to us, please. You know, just because.
     
  14. Meeqs

    Meeqs Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2012
    Messages:
    7,050
    Likes Received:
    712
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Location:
    USA
    You know how sometimes there is a proposal thats just complete garbage bad, like so bad there is no way this person has watched hockey for more than a week bad, and they likely sincerely don't realize it so you just feel bad for them?

    This is one of those posts.

    This is the equivalent of Kotkaniemi for Nemeth, Kerfoot and a 2nd
     
    Barklez and CobraAcesS like this.
  15. Meeqs

    Meeqs Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2012
    Messages:
    7,050
    Likes Received:
    712
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Location:
    USA
    Girard has been playing top pairing all year this year with overall strong underlying numbers.

    If MTL is going to make a trade the most likely option would be for Tyson Barrie for a futures type of package. Given the 5 million picks they just had and Barrie very likely to be moved in the next few months that one is at least realistic.
     
  16. Semyon Says

    Semyon Says grocery stick

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2012
    Messages:
    11,399
    Likes Received:
    2,239
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Location:
    downtown poundtown
    you wrote this on post 5 and no one said anything bad about lehkonen, but he is just not in the same realm as Girard.
     
  17. BabyPanda

    BabyPanda Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2018
    Messages:
    1,164
    Likes Received:
    805
    Trophy Points:
    82
    Gender:
    Male
    Really? What's Colorado's d pairings been lately?

    Edit: Just curious
     
  18. chet1926

    chet1926 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2008
    Messages:
    8,214
    Likes Received:
    693
    Trophy Points:
    139
    Occupation:
    Paralegal
    Location:
    Denver
    Girard-Johnson
    Cole-Barrie
    Graves/Nemeth-Zadorov
     
  19. Balthazar

    Balthazar Someone

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2006
    Messages:
    12,403
    Likes Received:
    4,062
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Avs need top 4 LHD. Girard isn't available.
     
  20. BabyPanda

    BabyPanda Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2018
    Messages:
    1,164
    Likes Received:
    805
    Trophy Points:
    82
    Gender:
    Male
    Dang, I can see why they are struggling so much lately.
     
  21. Mac Attack

    Mac Attack Beefy Legs

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2018
    Messages:
    170
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    24
    Gender:
    Male
    Honestly their defense isn't that bad. No #1 guy which can be rough but otherwise pretty well rounded. It's their goaltending and scoring depth that are both a kick in the teeth.
     
  22. Meeqs

    Meeqs Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2012
    Messages:
    7,050
    Likes Received:
    712
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Location:
    USA
    EJ-Girard has been the top pairing all season pretty much. They had great possession numbers until the recent skid, went a bit below 50% for a stretch and now are rounding back into form.

    The rest has shuffled with injuries but the most common are Cole/Barrie and Zads/Nemeth. Ideally they'd want Zads with Barrie but Cole/Nemeth struggles too much to move the puck and Zads can carry that line.
     
  23. Meeqs

    Meeqs Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2012
    Messages:
    7,050
    Likes Received:
    712
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Location:
    USA
    They've been "struggling" lately because they have had a 95% PDO for the past 25 games. Their play has been fine, just brutal luck, mostly by unthinkably bad goal tending, but their shot raters over that time defensively were in the upper end of the league.
     
  24. The Kingslayer

    The Kingslayer Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2004
    Messages:
    43,112
    Likes Received:
    5,305
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    Siem Reap, Cambodia
    Yah because none of those guys can play goalie.
     
  25. BabyPanda

    BabyPanda Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2018
    Messages:
    1,164
    Likes Received:
    805
    Trophy Points:
    82
    Gender:
    Male
    Yah, none of those guys can play defense too. :sarcasm:

    Kidding aside, a good number 1 d does wonders for making mediocre goaltending look great. I haven't seen any Avs games this year but I imagine that a top pairing improvement would definitely help more than it'd hurt the goalies.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"