NotProkofievian
Registered User
- Nov 29, 2011
- 24,512
- 24,654
Your theory is irrelevant to the fact that goalies can win or lose games, almost single handedly.
This is proof by assertion. Boring.
Your theory is irrelevant to the fact that goalies can win or lose games, almost single handedly.
This is proof by assertion. Boring.
Proof that goalies can win games? Yes.
Proof by assertion is not a sound proof, Mr. ''You should check your logic.'' You are asserting something, and have offered absolutely nothing in support of it. It can thus be ignored. You're wrong, and that can be tough to deal with sometimes. Chin up.
Goalies can and do win games, quite often. Hence why their wins and losses are recorded.
Yeah, how many game winning goals do they record for goalies, typically?
It’s a possibility to award a goalie a game winning goal. But again, it’s irrelevant. Goalies don’t need to score to win, they need to stop pucks.
It's quite odd that they call them ''game winning goals'' wouldn't you say, if you didn't need to score in order to win. Any idea on who leads the league in ''game winning saves''?