Really, really dumb move if the play Anderson.
I disagree. Hammond had a good run but Anderson clearly the better goalie IMO. It's one thing to go on a streak and do well for 20 some games in net. Anderson has shown over a much longer period of time that he was a good goalie in the NHL. Hammond hasn't established himself as a strong goalie in any league.
game 1, hammond looked bad.
game 2, he kept the sens in the game.
but i agree. anderson is the better goalie, i just don't think hammond is to blame for their losses. their d turns it over a lot, and gives up a ton of odd man rushes.
Made some good saves in the 2nd game but still gave up 2 softies. Can't happen. On the whole he hasn't been nearly good enough in the first 2 games for the Sens and there's nothing in the past that would indicate he had any kind of prolonged success in any league.