Value of: MN Wild players for draft picks only

Dr Jan Itor

Registered User
Dec 10, 2009
45,368
20,282
MinneSNOWta
Just an exercise, but let's say that Minnesota goes scorched-earth like the Philadelphia 76ers of a few years ago and don't care if we only win 10 games for the next couple of years.

Picks only, no roster players*, no current prospects... What does your team offer for the following players:

*1-2 year cap dumps allowed

Staal (1 x $3.5 remaining)
Granlund (2 x $5.75)
Zucker (RFA)
Coyle (2 x $3.2)
Niederreiter (4 x $5.25)
Koivu (assuming he waives NMC to anywhere) (2 x $5.5)
Suter (assuming he waives NMC to anywhere) (7 x $7.5)
Spurgeon (2 x $5.188)
Dumba (RFA)
Brodin (3 x 4.167)
Dubnyk (3 x $4.333)

-------------------------------

Leading offers:

Dumba
Edmonton for #10 in 2018 + 2019 1st (+ Bear)

Zucker
Florida for #34 in 2018 + 2019 1st

Coyle
Colorado for #16 in 2018

Brodin
Colorado for Ottawa's 2019 1st

Dubnyk
Philadelphia for #19 in 2018

Staal (+ #63 in 2018)
St. Louis for Winnipeg 1st in 2018

Spurgeon
Toronto for #25 in 2018 + 2019 1st (+ Kapanen)

Granlund (+ #86 in 2018)
Arizona for #5 in 2018

Niederreiter
Los Angeles for #51 in 2018 + 2019 or 2020 1st (+ Clifford)
 
Last edited:

Captain Mountain

Formerly Captain Wolverine
Jun 6, 2010
20,475
14,054
Really don't see this going well, especially since other teams would generally want to clear cap/salary in a deal.
 

Bazeek

Registered Lurker
Sponsor
Jul 26, 2011
17,884
11,256
Exiled in Madison
The premise was only picks, no roster players or prospects.
Good point, though I interpreted that more as not offering roster players/prospects as something of value. If it's just shuffling cap space around to make the deal work it still seems to be in the spirit of the thread/thought experiment. Similar to adding an ECHL forward to a deal to make the contract slots work.
 

Jared Dunn

Registered User
Dec 23, 2013
8,350
2,775
Yellowknife
Am I out to lunch proposing Granlund + your 1st for 3rd overall? Not sure how you guys value him right now but I've always been a fan

EDIT: I don't think I'd ultimately do it since they should rebuild, but realistically doesn't seem like they'll go in that direction so long as Bergevin remains
 

Jared Dunn

Registered User
Dec 23, 2013
8,350
2,775
Yellowknife
I think adding our 1st is too much. Granlund is in pretty elite offensive company since being moved to wing full time.

Yikes moved to wing full time really removes any interest. Was not aware they'd done that

If this was Granlund for the #3 I'd do it but also giving up our first is over payment.

I think there's a value gap between #3 and Granlund but maybe not your 1st. Nonetheless, now that I know he isn't playing center there isn't really a point. Would have interest in Brodin though, but it wouldn't include #3 and I really don't know where to start
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Dr Jan Itor

Registered User
Dec 10, 2009
45,368
20,282
MinneSNOWta
I think there's a value gap between #3 and Granlund but maybe not your 1st. Nonetheless, now that I know he isn't playing center there isn't really a point. Would have interest in Brodin though, but it wouldn't include #3 and I really don't know where to start

Don't you guys have four 2nd rounders this summer? How about 2 of those and a future 1st?
 

Captain Mountain

Formerly Captain Wolverine
Jun 6, 2010
20,475
14,054
Am I out to lunch proposing Granlund + your 1st for 3rd overall? Not sure how you guys value him right now but I've always been a fan

EDIT: I don't think I'd ultimately do it since they should rebuild, but realistically doesn't seem like they'll go in that direction so long as Bergevin remains

The bigger issue with that is that Montreal is trading high end assets for a position they don't need help at. Montreal needs Centers and LHD, not wingers.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad