Dr Jan Itor
Registered User
I was going by the actual months in question.
Fantastic. Proud of you.
I was going by the actual months in question.
Agreed, it would be easier to take off he had a middle ground, but he simply doesn't. I agree, I'm just hoping for him to boost his stock at this point.Coyle was just as on or off in 16-17 season.
-13g/24a (37p) in the first 45 games of the season. (some combo of Parise, Nino, Staal)
-4g/8a (12p)the next 31 games. They tried him with everyone to get his game (and the team's) going.
-1g/6a (7p) the last 6 games. (Hanzal/Pommer)
He just has no middle ground to his game, it's either on or off. It's not a gradual falling off of his game either, it's a drop off of a cliff.
I'm hoping he's on a hot streak that lasts until the TDL, ride it until then then trade him. He hasn't done much in the Playoffs to justify keeping him for that reason.
Plus I don't think hes in the long term plans. He'll get more on the open market than MN should pay him with his next contract. He took the safe money bet with his last contract and has been underpayed for all of the deal.
Barring another team getting desperate and overpaying, is there any advantage to trading him at the deadline rather than waiting until the draft?Coyle was just as on or off in 16-17 season.
-13g/24a (37p) in the first 45 games of the season. (some combo of Parise, Nino, Staal)
-4g/8a (12p)the next 31 games. They tried him with everyone to get his game (and the team's) going.
-1g/6a (7p) the last 6 games. (Hanzal/Pommer)
He just has no middle ground to his game, it's either on or off. It's not a gradual falling off of his game either, it's a drop off of a cliff.
I'm hoping he's on a hot streak that lasts until the TDL, ride it until then then trade him. He hasn't done much in the Playoffs to justify keeping him for that reason.
Plus I don't think hes in the long term plans. He'll get more on the open market than MN should pay him with his next contract. He took the safe money bet with his last contract and has been underpayed for all of the deal.
Playoff disappearance could hurt his value again.Barring another team getting desperate and overpaying, is there any advantage to trading him at the deadline rather than waiting until the draft?
I doubt that'd affect his value all that much. If his history already indicates that he doesn't do well in the playoffs, one more data point isn't going to affect things. The TDL is also when playoff performance is going to be at the forefront of most GM's minds. At the draft you're more likely to see bids from teams like Arizona, Carolina and Florida that are just looking to make the playoffs.Playoff disappearance could hurt his value again.
GMs often overreact at the deadline, it can work to our advantage. At the draft, trades have been becoming fewer and farther between.I doubt that'd affect his value all that much. If his history already indicates that he doesn't do well in the playoffs, one more data point isn't going to affect things. The TDL is also when playoff performance is going to be at the forefront of most GM's minds. At the draft you're more likely to see bids from teams like Arizona, Carolina and Florida that are just looking to make the playoffs.
More importantly, I don't think we're likely to trade him for anything that helps us more than Coyle himself does this year. Reading through other teams' forums, opposing fans are justifiably confused as to why the Wild are considering trading him when our biggest immediate need is a right-shot RW or center, ideally a young one with a few years on his contract.
But at the draft? Go crazy.
I'm definitely not opposed to benefiting from another team's desperation. But I'm also keen on not being that desperate teamGMs often overreact at the deadline, it can work to our advantage. At the draft, trades have been becoming fewer and farther between.
Barring another team getting desperate and overpaying, is there any advantage to trading him at the deadline rather than waiting until the draft?
That's a fair point, and I have to admit that teams like Boston and Philadelphia are almost certainly feeling more heat to make a deal now than they will at the draft.A rental+1 has more value than a rental. It gives whoever gets him 2 Playoff pushes/runs, and 100 (rental+1) games compared to ~20 (rental) and more time to figure out if they want to re-sign or trade him the next year. The team getting him can recoup some of their losses if their next season goes sideways or he doesn't fit.
Coyle isn't a top-tier player (Panarin) that'll get a huge return no matter when he's traded. He's on a good contract; which helps offset a bad one going into next year too.
Why so condescending?
That's a fair point, and I have to admit that teams like Boston and Philadelphia are almost certainly feeling more heat to make a deal now than they will at the draft.
Would you consider (say) San Jose's 1st worth going from Coyle to Eriksson-Ek at 3C for the year?Injuries could bring more teams into the mix too.
Buffalo with it's 3 1sts could be a buyer at the TDL too, and they need depth more than top end talent. They have some nice peices in the AHL, but they just aren't NHL ready. The extra year of Coyle could be valuable to them. Pommer's deal ends this year, and I'm not sure they want to bring him back for any real term/money. Especially when they want to keep Skinner, but he's going to be an expensive contract.
That doesn't mean you have to be condescending.I knew where you got your numbers. You supplied a link and it was clear to see. I had not supplied a link, so when you corrected my numbers, I figured I should let you know why they were different.
That doesn't mean you have to be condescending.
I provided the link sure, but I was just pointing out that even before any of the numbers were posted, that I meant the actual months.
Misunderstandings occur too easily on message boards.
Would you consider (say) San Jose's 1st worth going from Coyle to Eriksson-Ek at 3C for the year?
I could live with something around Coyle for JFK, should something like that come to pass.Considering neither have really been good as the 3C this year?
- I'm mostly holding on to Coyle until Koivu is back healthy. So that pushes it until after X-mas with the trade freeze in a couple of days
- I'd still prefer a close to NHL ready prospect over a straight pick right now. JFK from Bos is the trade I want to happen.
- I'd take the pick if MN was out of it at the TDL.
Coyle needs to string together more good games to get into the value range that most fans and GMPF is likely looking for. 2 good games doesn't do much to offset the ~25 bad ones he's had this year.
Alex Stalock is so prepared for his opportunity to score he has considered using a second goalie stick late in games when his Minnesota Wild have the lead.
"I want to get an empty net curve," Stalock said with a laugh. "Come to the bench and get one with a big-old heel curve so you can launch it up and over everyone."
Actually, looking at Staal continuing to struggle... I say go withRun this when everyone is back:
Zucker-Staal-Granlund
Greenway-Coyle-Kunin
Parise-Koivu-Nino
Foligno-Fehr-Hendricks/Brown
Actually, looking at Staal continuing to struggle... I say go with
Zucker-Koivu-Granlund
Parise-Coyle-Nino
Greenway-Staal-Kunin
And the rest
If that line regains the form of two years ago... why not? That was one of the best lines in the entire league that year. I say it's worth giving a shot.I just don’t like Koivu with Granlund and Zucker. IMO your lines look fine too, I would just switch Coyle and Koivu’s wingers.
If that line regains the form of two years ago... why not? That was one of the best lines in the entire league that year. I say it's worth giving a shot.
I would switch Kunin and NinoRun this when everyone is back:
Zucker-Staal-Granlund
Greenway-Coyle-Kunin
Parise-Koivu-Nino
Foligno-Fehr-Hendricks/Brown