Nizdizzle
Offseason Is The Worst Season
I'm caught up to episode 7. Really digging the show. The pacing is great, and I think the lead does such a great job. Really excited to finish the 1st season this weekend.
Watched first 4 episodes. Really great.
No offense, but that's not much of a bingeBinged this show in about 2 weeks. Really great new show. Love the gritty feel to it.
I must be missing something but this show is just banal, with a boring lead, and dialogue that oscillates between dullness and grotesqueness - I guess to keep people from falling asleep. And some of the absolute worst sex scenes I've ever seen in my life. This agent and the lady doing it was like watching cadavers, or like aliens pretending to be people. Was this an allegory for the show's themes in some way or what? Good christ.
I can't force myself to spend 10 episodes with this FBI dullard's point of view. And all the dumbed-down amateur psychology throughout this made my eyes hurt from rolling. I don't know what has happened to Fincher's talent for story, and people's praise for the show is mystifying.
What TV do you like?
Curious.
The mood, soundtrack, etc., very LA Confidential.
I must be missing something but this show is just banal, with a boring lead, and dialogue that oscillates between dullness and grotesqueness - I guess to keep people from falling asleep. And some of the absolute worst sex scenes I've ever seen in my life. This agent and the lady doing it was like watching cadavers, or like aliens pretending to be people. Was this an allegory for the show's themes in some way or what? Good christ.
I can't force myself to spend 10 episodes with this FBI dullard's point of view. And all the dumbed-down amateur psychology throughout this made my eyes hurt from rolling. I don't know what has happened to Fincher's talent for story, and people's praise for the show is mystifying.
No offense, but that's not much of a binge
I'm watching The Deuce right now, which is good. I am not a big David Simon fan, but he can develop characters, make them human and flawed in interesting ways. And his treatment of sex and violence is thoughtful - it is full of pathos and kind of transcends its own barbarity.
Mindhunter is obviously not trying to do the same thing. I don't know what it is trying to do. While watching it, many of the shots in it reminded me of the video game LA Noir (even though its set in the 70s), which is why I stuck around for a while. Maybe that is what it could have been, a nice genre movie in the noir tradition. I am beginning to suspect that Fincher wasn't around all that much, because it is so low on atmosphere.
Also the intellectual serial killer trope has become a massive cliche.
If you didn't know..It's based on real life. Fincher is not a telling a story, he is relaying them. This stuff actually happened.
I don't think this argument is persuasive. That something happened in real life and is therefore worth adapting, particularly into fiction. I also think that fictions based on real life are just that... fictions. After all, all fiction is based on real life to some extent.
I don't think believing Dragons and Unicorns is based on real life is real persuasive either
You're being pedantic here. Something based on real life is still fiction. Even documentaries tend to fail to capture "truth" due to the fact that they tell stories from a particular point of view and ideology. This is always the case. We are not even talking about that, but about a show clearly designed to tell a story and to entertain.
Besides if adherence to actual events is now our criteria for aesthetic excellence, you might then love to see footage of me getting on a bus this morning.
Being pessimistic is not really a persuasive argument either
Your psychology of what telling a story based on true events is not needed. Most people know this and know how it works
So when you come out and call the serial killer with the high IQ portrayed in the movie as "cliche". It's not cliche. He had a high IQ. The cliche would be based on him if he weren't real
Now if it were Bugs Bunny who came out as the serial killer and was portrayed as the one with the high IQ, that would be cliche
What you did is like calling Einstein, a real life mathematician, a cliche b/c he knows math rather well
What am I being pessimistic about?
The archetype of a brainy serial killer is a cliche, because this has been done to death ever since The Silence of the Lambs. I don't see what this has to do with Einstein, a real person.
This said, many depictions of Einstein in fictions are cliched. For example Einstein is sometimes represented as a goofy and absent-minded professor (like in the movie IQ). That archetype is a cliche.
I don't always have a problem with cliches. They can be fun, but this show wants to be taken quite seriously and in my opinion the cliche doesn't help its case.
Again, we get that this is being told as a story and everything isn't 100% factual. But your OP came off as pessimistic and dismissive.
As far as Silence of the Lambs. This stuff happened in real life and before Silence of the Lambs. So just b/c it's being told 15 years later doesn't make it a cliche. Hannibal Lecter...that was the cliche...based on the groundwork of this stuff. IMO you have it backwards
It's like if I decided to make a movie 5 years ago about a boy named Dirk Diggler who played hockey and scored 215 points in a season. Then this year somebody made a movie about Greztky. You call that movie cliche?
No offense, but that's not much of a binge