I often ask myself: what if Hutch went on a tear at the end of the season, instead of the start? Discount the fact that he probably wouldn't have gotten the opportunity, as you earn your starts based on your performance, but what if his streak was at the end, like Pav? Would people feel differently about his performance?
I ask, because he put up very close to league average numbers in the end, and his win %'age was really quite good (heck, almost Fucale-like
). If it weren't for the COMBINATION of the two goalies, we would not have been in the playoffs last year.
I don't buy that they've got a book on him - I think he had some poor performances, and most likely needs to work on a few fundamentals to fix some of the issues, just like Pav did at the beginning of the year. I agree with Gm0ney that Hutch being able to address these issues is probably a less difficult task than the really fundamental problems that Pav has been working to address. I will also state that I do think that Pav DID improve on some of his fundamentals, to his credit.