KingEriksson
#ErikssonToNYR
I have seen Michael Grabner fall from a 30 + goal scorer to a fringe 2nd liner.what is the cause of this?
Agree with this except Grabner is much more than a decent penalty killer, he is an excellent penalty killer who aside from being obvious by breaking up rushes, closing passing lanes, make the opposing power play tentative and less assertive because of breakaway threat. Calling him decent is understating what we are seeing.Grabner is still an asset unlike Bailey. I see Grabner as more of a 3rd liner who can jump up and play on the 2nd line if injuries occur.
Grabner is a decent penalty killer and could/should chip in 20 goals and 35 points a year from the 3rd line. Im not sure why Capuano/Weight have never given Grabner a chance on the 2nd PP unit when deadweight like Cmac and Clutterbuck have had ice time.
If Grabner was counted on to be on the 3rd line from opening night our top 9 would be in good shape. Right now we have 3 top 6 players. 2/3 3rd liners and 6-8 4th liners/AHL guys
Grabner is what he is. I don't think he's got the hockey sense to be any better than he is right now. He's going to have ups and downs, he's a streaky player, but he's not going to be the consistent, effective, dynamic scorer we want, not the 34 goal guy from his first year. At least I don't think so.
I still think he's a valuable asset and player but in a limited role. I don't see him as a top six player because he seems so difficult to play with. You rarely see Grabner (regardless of who he's out there with) maintain offensive zone pressure, get close to the net for a rebound/deflection or a crease-battle, he doesn't play any kind of puck possession or cycle game - he's basicall an off-the-rush player using his incredible speed to generate scoring chances. And that will always be his unique strength/differentiator as a player.
I don't think he's worth much on the open market. He's valuable in a limited way and I'd like the Islanders to keep him around. But I don't think it's coaching or linemates or ice-time - it's just his hockey sense, that's his limiting factor as a player. But, those wheels, wow.
Grabner is what he is. I don't think he's got the hockey sense to be any better than he is right now. He's going to have ups and downs, he's a streaky player, but he's not going to be the consistent, effective, dynamic scorer we want, not the 34 goal guy from his first year. At least I don't think so.
I still think he's a valuable asset and player but in a limited role. I don't see him as a top six player because he seems so difficult to play with. You rarely see Grabner (regardless of who he's out there with) maintain offensive zone pressure, get close to the net for a rebound/deflection or a crease-battle, he doesn't play any kind of puck possession or cycle game - he's basicall an off-the-rush player using his incredible speed to generate scoring chances. And that will always be his unique strength/differentiator as a player.
I don't think he's worth much on the open market. He's valuable in a limited way and I'd like the Islanders to keep him around. But I don't think it's coaching or linemates or ice-time - it's just his hockey sense, that's his limiting factor as a player. But, those wheels, wow.
As for scoring potential, Grabner's mind is his worst enemy. He thinks too much and doesn't commit. He has a good shot, he just has to choose deke or shot and go with it. probably better off shooting most times.
Grabner needs a real coach as does the rest of this team.
I floated the shoot over deke question in a GDT a while ago. I think taking a shot from just below the hash marks might be a better option for him with his speed. He ties himself in knots a lot going for the deke in close.
Anyone else have a thought on this?
I floated the shoot over deke question in a GDT a while ago. I think taking a shot from just below the hash marks might be a better option for him with his speed. He ties himself in knots a lot going for the deke in close.
Anyone else have a thought on this?
Starkbaum had to face 52 shots and he has saved 44 of them. I don't call that "weak goaltending".Grabner's line played well. If the team had D and Goaltending...wait doesn't that sound familiar!
Someone on the flyers board said they are like the Islanders, no defense and goaltending and with Vanek and Grabner upfrontGrabner's line played well. If the team had D and Goaltending...wait doesn't that sound familiar!