895
Registered User
- Jun 15, 2007
- 8,406
- 7,084
Have you read the OP? The GM signed a player that does not fit in the system. You admit that yourself.Not really .Ship didn't fit the system and didn't want to learn in the AHL.
Gusev, how many teams are putting in new players with a few days practice.
The simple answer is not always the right one. New contracts aren't affected by it at all.
Oh, using the opportunity to thank the Sharks for sending Gusev to the WCH.As a Sharks fan, I was ecstatic with every game that Vegas didn’t play Gusev.
Not really .Ship didn't fit the system and didn't want to learn in the AHL.
Gusev, how many teams are putting in new players with a few days practice.
karma for not playing a crazy Russian superstar Gusev?Well, karma returned to Gallant in the best possible way. I hope, he liked it...
Why is that?
Colorado with Cale Makar.
Makar has spent his whole life playing on NA sized rinks. Gusev has not.
It really doesnt matter that much. Gusev should have played that's why they signed him in the first place.
Seriously, do these two guys even communicate in regards to players signings?
It seems that McPhee signs players he likes and then Gallant needs to deal with them knowing basically nothing about them.
First, they get Schipachyov, a great playmaking center. He’s put alongside grinders and barely has any ice time with skilled players. As a result, he bolts and forgets it all as a nightmare.
Now, they sign Gusev, undeniably the best hockey player outside NHL, then Gallant says “I need to see what I can do with him, we already have a roster”.
Now, a spot on the team becomes available for game 7, and he picks Pirri instead, who was absolutely terrible. Literally how do you sit a Panarin level player when your team was struggling offensively beyond first line?
This is outrageous
Not really .Ship didn't fit the system and didn't want to learn in the AHL.
Gusev, how many teams are putting in new players with a few days practice.
Gallant playing Gusev in a game 7 as his first game on NHL ice with teammates he barely knows and has had almost no practice with would have been arguably the dumbest coaching move of the century. Imagine if Gusev has been the one to take the penalty Eakin did? Or Gusev wet the bed and made a bad pass directly leading to the GWG against. You can ruin a guy that way by destroying his confidence and aggressiveness or turning an entire fan base against him as a scapegoat. That’s next level dumb. Thankfully Gallant isn’t a moron.
Gusev is 26. The guy has played on NHL sized rinks before. If he can play hockey better than some one else on the team you put him in. It's not rocket surgery.
It does matter. Makar has also had dev camps with the organization for a few years now. Gusev has spent a week in Vegas.
Avs put Makar in with no practice.Not really .Ship didn't fit the system and didn't want to learn in the AHL.
Gusev, how many teams are putting in new players with a few days practice.
Makar is 20 years old. Gusev is 26 and has been playing against men for years. Gusev should have played that's why they signed him.
Now they have all summer to evaluate that mistake.
All correctMakar is 20 years old. Gusev is 26 and has been playing against men for years. Gusev should have played that's why they signed him.
Now they have all summer to evaluate that mistake.
Well, karma returned to Gallant in the best possible way. I hope, he liked it...