This just leaves Saku as the only RFA not signed, right?
This just leaves Saku as the only RFA not signed, right?
Two things:
First of all, just noticed that we are outspending every Canadian team but Edmonton.
Secondly, I'm not sure what anybody is hoping to gain in the Forsberg negotiations. We really need him on a two-way deal and I'm not sure if the arbitrators can grant him a one-way contract if it is what he desires. He was pretty darn good in the AHL last season. Despite the fact that even though Chicago's goalie situation was the pits and he was passed over by a younger, less experienced guy, the Checkers' goalie consultant apparently had some good words to say about him.
All of this is to say, does this make a Reimer trade smell more likely? And who the hell would we trade him to anyway.
My 2nd thought is that if the Borg decides to deal rather than bury Reimer because of Forsberg winning the #2, they should use him to take a shot on buying rock-bottom on Wennberg, who had a horrible season last year but is still only 24 and is locked up on what should be his prime years.
why couldn't the arbitrators grant him a one-way deal?? that's likely what the negotations are over. one-way vs two-way, or maybe differences over ahl salary on a two-way.Secondly, I'm not sure what anybody is hoping to gain in the Forsberg negotiations. We really need him on a two-way deal and I'm not sure if the arbitrators can grant him a one-way contract if it is what he desires.
Yeah. Maybe he recovers his game, but I don’t think it is worth us taking the chance. The Canes have good contracts right now and we don’t need to take the chance.That Wennberg contract vs. his recent production...Do.Not.Want.
Makes sense to me. They wanted to get rid of one of our top 5 D in anticipation of an Aho offer sheet. Move Faulk and it helps for one year. Move de Hann and it helps this year plus.that deal with chicago continues to make no sense. unless they're actively trying to shop reimer, it's going to be between ned and forsberg to be the ahl starter. carolina gave ned a poison pill second year guaranteed to make it less likely a team would claim from waivers considering it's one way money, so he's obviously being prioritized over forsberg.
Makes sense to me. They wanted to get rid of one of our top 5 D in anticipation of an Aho offer sheet. Move Faulk and it helps for one year. Move de Hann and it helps this year plus.
The return wasn’t a factor imo. Not saying it was the right move, only time will tell.
If I were in charge, I'd trade Reimer, stash the cap space for a trade deadline deal and take a leap of faith on either Forsberg or Ned being a suitable backup for this year.
But I'm not in charge, and in some circles, I'm known as a moron
If I were in charge I’d be on the phone with Vegas looking to put a deal in place for Gusev so that if Willie doesn’t have a decision made by August, we have a plan to replace his top-6 RHS.If I were in charge, I'd trade Reimer, stash the cap space for a trade deadline deal and take a leap of faith on either Forsberg or Ned being a suitable backup for this year.
But I'm not in charge, and in some circles, I'm known as a moron
Even if Forsberg has an extremely good training camp and makes the team as the #2, I don't think that they need to trade Reimer. They can easily just bury him in the AHL Moulson-style and save a million in cap space. My bet, though, is still that Reimer has a rebound season here and gets dealt next year for an actual asset.
I think that is what the GMBC is thinking.Has reimer ever really played behind a solid defense? I dont remember any of those Toronto or florida teams being particularly stout (though I say that totally off the top of my head with no research). He may have a resurgence with these defenders in front of him