McDavid/Draisaitl vs Crosby/Malkin

Better Duo?


  • Total voters
    177
  • Poll closed .

theicebox

#MonixWatch
Jan 8, 2010
2,829
1,121
Pittsburgh
img-2168206-f.jpg
 

Luigi Lemieux

Registered User
Sep 26, 2003
21,591
9,500
Nah we don’t have a dman that could touch Gonchar/Letang and Koskinen is nowhere near MAF.
I agree with him that the 09 pens were one of the weaker cup winners, but the roster was still much deeper than the oilers of the past few years. Pens defense was Gonchar-Orpik, Letang-Eaton, Scuderi-Gill, Crosby-Malkin-Staal down the middle and Fleury in net. Really solid backbone to work with. That said it's still true that Crosby-Malkin flat out carried the team to that cup.
 

Video Nasty

Registered User
Mar 12, 2017
4,760
8,352
29 seasons versus 11 seasons.

Crosby/Malkin of course.

The potential is there for McDavid/Drai.
 

Perfect_Drug

Registered User
Mar 24, 2006
15,633
12,005
Montreal
Most people including Oiler fans should say Crosby/Malkin.


That said, even when both Crosby / Malking were injured, the Penguins were an incredibly formidable team without them.
 

McFlash97

Registered User
Oct 10, 2017
7,469
6,509
Most people including Oiler fans should say Crosby/Malkin.


That said, even when both Crosby / Malking were injured, the Penguins were an incredibly formidable team without them.


past sure,

Now .. Draisaitl and McDavid win it hands down.
 

BAM

Registered User
Nov 21, 2016
4,048
2,299
Cups = Pens

talent= Oilers
Talent wise out of the 4 its

Crosby/McDavid
Malkin
LD

So no, the Pens duo is more talented. The same forward depth Oiler fans complain about is what Sid and Geno had for most of their careers. And they never spent good chunks of any season as the other's most common line-mate unlike McDavid and LD.
 
  • Like
Reactions: authentic

BAM

Registered User
Nov 21, 2016
4,048
2,299
I get what your point is and you most likely are right but not all situations are equal. You're comparing playing with Leafs' players compared to playing with McDavid. And, Panarin is a much better player than Tavares is on the offensive side.

So while the 160 point projection is obviously crazy, I'm pretty sure Panarin would be a 105+ point scorer playing alongside McDavid. He was on pace for 113 points this past season on a lottery team without him.

Since Panarin has been in the NHL (5 seasons worth)

ppg = 1.06, average of 87 points per season

Tavares in the 5 years Panarin has been in the NHL
ppg = 0.96, average of 79 points per season

Panarin was the sole superstar forward on the Jackets like Tavares was on the Isles. Panarin had the chance to play with peak Kane and now a 1C in Zibby, Tavares' best winger was Marner and player overall was Matthews.

An 8 point gap in averages constitutes a much better player on the offensive side?
 

Perfect_Drug

Registered User
Mar 24, 2006
15,633
12,005
Montreal
Talent wise out of the 4 its

Crosby/McDavid
Malkin
LD

So no, the Pens duo is more talented. The same forward depth Oiler fans complain about is what Sid and Geno had for most of their careers. And they never spent good chunks of any season as the other's most common line-mate unlike McDavid and LD.

I hate this argument. Every time it's ever brought up.

Reverse the teams around them.


Do you honestly believe Crosby/Malkin are going to carry that Oilers team with Smith/Koskinen in net, and that putrid Defense with that horrible depth?

You honestly believe that's a cup-winning roster, if they just swapped out McDavid for Crosby?



Use your head when you post this nonsense.
 

BAM

Registered User
Nov 21, 2016
4,048
2,299
I hate this argument. Every time it's ever brought up.

Reverse the teams around them.


Do you honestly believe Crosby/Malkin are going to carry that Oilers team with Smith/Koskinen in net, and that putrid Defense with that horrible depth?

You honestly believe that's a cup-winning roster, if they just swapped out McDavid for Crosby?



Use your head when you post this nonsense.
I hate when Oiler fans do this, all in their feelings because someone doesn't think their opinion is true.

Fine lets, reverse the teams, you seriously think McDavid and LD produce what they do WITHOUT playing together as much as they have?

The McDavid era started with Hall, McDavid, LD, RNH...it's not Crosby/Malkin fault that they lost one.

Enough with the hypotheticals...all we know is what we've seen. LD as great an offensive talent that he is, is not McDavid, Crosby or Malkin level. And he's also a negative in the defensive-zone...like really bad. Those 3 were superstars the moment they hit NHL ice. LD wasn't that.

McDavid/Crosby
Malkin
LD
 

Spawn

Something in the water
Feb 20, 2006
43,694
15,254
Edmonton
Depends on the question.

If you're asking who is better right now it's McDavid and Draisaitl and to suggest otherwise is in my opinion disingenuous.

If you're asking peak than it's Crosby and Malkin and it is equally disingenuous to suggest otherwise.

Draisaitl is the weak link in the discussion. He needs a few more seasons as one of the very best players in the league to be able to enter the discussion. There is also of course the playoff success that the Oilers duo will need to start to have to legitimately enter the conversation.
 

KrisLetAngry

MrJukeBoy
Dec 20, 2013
18,181
4,359
Saskatchewan
In 5 years let's see what McDavid and Driastl do together and then maybe it is them.

Malkin and Crosby have had amazing careers and 3 cups. Obviously right now I'd take the Oilers DUO younger etc.

Very fun watching all 4 players on the ice though.
 

Varan

Registered User
Nov 27, 2016
6,467
4,771
Toronto, Ontario
Since Panarin has been in the NHL (5 seasons worth)

ppg = 1.06, average of 87 points per season

Tavares in the 5 years Panarin has been in the NHL
ppg = 0.96, average of 79 points per season

Panarin was the sole superstar forward on the Jackets like Tavares was on the Isles. Panarin had the chance to play with peak Kane and now a 1C in Zibby, Tavares' best winger was Marner and player overall was Matthews.

An 8 point gap in averages constitutes a much better player on the offensive side?
Why are you bringing up stats from his draft? I'm talking about right now and in this past season, Panarin finished 3rd in scoring and outscored Tavares by 35 points. This season was when he really took a big leap into superstardom/MVP-caliber player.

The year before, he had one fewer point than Tavares, who just had his career year in 3 fewer games played, while playing on a much worse team than the Leafs. Leafs were 7th in the league standings compared to 26th for the Rangers.

Talking about right NOW, and right now, Panarin is worlds better offensively. A 35 point gap suggests that. The Rangers are fighting for the #1 pick without Panarin. The Leafs, more or less, have the same team from last year.
 
Last edited:

Someone

Registered User
Jul 11, 2007
870
183
Crosby and Malkin are approaching the end of their careers which have seen success, both personal and team, at the highest level. They have both taken home every trophy (including 2 cups) that you could hope for, and basically guaranteed their spot in the hall of fame, and a spot in the discussion in all time best lists.

McDavid and Draisaitl are at the beginning of their careers. Both have had tremendous personal success already with art ross/hart/lindsay trophies but have a long way to go to equal the longevity, consistency, and team success that the pens duo has had. While there is every chance the Oilers duo can approach, if not exceed what Crosby and Malkin have done, to expect/project them to is pretty difficult to do, and there's nothing wrong with that.
 

Bertuzzzi44

Registered User
Jun 26, 2018
3,424
3,015
Didn’t we have a similar question with MacKinnon & Rantanen last year? Crosby & Malkin have ripped up the league consistently, they were dominant in the playoffs and have 3 Stanley Cups each. Leon was a -7 despite winning the Hart and seems lost at times in his own end (Crosby +175 career), this isn’t even close.
 

McVespa99

Registered User
May 13, 2007
5,955
2,710
If we are talking now its the Oilers. If we are talking peak or career to date its the Pens.
 

DearDiary

🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷
Aug 29, 2010
14,800
11,771
Crosby and Malkin are approaching the end of their careers which have seen success, both personal and team, at the highest level. They have both taken home every trophy (including 2 cups) that you could hope for, and basically guaranteed their spot in the hall of fame, and a spot in the discussion in all time best lists.

McDavid and Draisaitl are at the beginning of their careers. Both have had tremendous personal success already with art ross/hart/lindsay trophies but have a long way to go to equal the longevity, consistency, and team success that the pens duo has had. While there is every chance the Oilers duo can approach, if not exceed what Crosby and Malkin have done, to expect/project them to is pretty difficult to do, and there's nothing wrong with that.

Crosby/Malkin have won 3 cups not 2. Along with 4 Cup final appearances

They've also made the playoffs 14 straight seasons (next best at 6) and won way more playoff games than anyone else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sanscosm

Gurglesons

Registered User
Dec 18, 2009
92,361
74,583
San Diego, CA
last-train-tocool.blogspot.com
I hate this argument. Every time it's ever brought up.

Reverse the teams around them.


Do you honestly believe Crosby/Malkin are going to carry that Oilers team with Smith/Koskinen in net, and that putrid Defense with that horrible depth?

You honestly believe that's a cup-winning roster, if they just swapped out McDavid for Crosby?



Use your head when you post this nonsense.

I think in their prime they are at least a significant playoff threat with that roster.

Versus whatever the hell is going on in Edmonton.

PIT won a cup with a top six of Kunitz, Guerin, Fedotenko, and Talbot. Is that far removed from what the Oilers have right now? Even if you add in Staal, Edmonton has RNH behind McD and Drai who while not the size of Staal is arguably a better point producer and still no slouch defensively.

The defense was also better on paper, but Gonchar was significantly injured (MCL) in round 2 of 2009 so their D for the majority of the playoffs was at ES a lot of sophomore Letang, Eaton, Orpik, Gill and Scuderi. He added a little to the powerplay, but his production fell off a cliff after missing essential games in the Capital series.

The argument I guess you could make is depth wasn’t as universal as it is now in 2009.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad