Sky04
Registered User
- Jan 8, 2009
- 29,141
- 18,247
Oh I’m sure he is. Difference is I provide evidence and reasoning for my opinions.
Flawed logic, horrible reasoning due to inability to contextualize doesn't count.
Voted Rantanen,
Oh I’m sure he is. Difference is I provide evidence and reasoning for my opinions.
last i checked mackinnon has a 10% p/60 drop away from rants and rants has a 50% drop away from mack"Despite having MacKinnon"? Check MacKinnons stats away from Rantanen? MacKinnon and Landy suddenly exploded when they gor Rantanen on their line. Isnt that odd?
Landeskog 33p in 2016-2017
MacKinnon 53p in 2016-2017
Full-time with Rantanen
MacKinnon 97p 2017-2018
Landeskog 62p 2017-2018
Any 2nd liner has that kind of impact on linemates...
Well if it is Kase, I’m changing my vote to his trio.Did you mean Kase?
The line with 2 centres
Its how it goes, right?
Rantanen-Laine-Kane??? Laine and Rantanen are the 2 players Dominic hates most, so obviously he puts out a line that never would work. I`d take option A 11 times of 10, because the centers. This poll is stupid. Give Kane and Rants a center and its much closer. Its like
WHO do you take for 1st line:
Grubauer-McDavid-Josi
vs.
Marchand-MacKinnon-Pasternak
which trio is currently better
last i checked mackinnon has a 10% p/60 drop away from rants and rants has a 50% drop away from mack
I don't know but those hot takes he make can't be taken serious.What kind of sample sizes are we looking at here?
Did you mean Kase?
Judging players only by goals is laughable.Atlantic trio scored 43 goals this season.
Central - 49 goals.
And a player's ability to stay healthy is the same thing as player's size, speed, shooting etc.
So Central trio is better so far.
Rantanen > Matthews
Laine >/>> Marner
Kane <Point
When NHL / IIHF start counting something other than goals to define a winner of a game then we talk again.Judging players only by goals is laughable.
So you are saying that the winner of the Maurice Richard is automatically the best player in hockey, after all he does score more goals than anyone else.When NHL / IIHF start counting something other than goals to define a winner of a game then we talk again.
It is not me saying this it is the reality of the hockey game.So you are saying that the winner of the Maurice Richard is automatically the best player in hockey, after all he does score more goals than anyone else.
It is not me saying this it is the reality of the hockey game.
What happened? Those nasty facts refused to support your theories? Try to base your theories on facts next time.Lol.
Then why doesn't the Richard winner often not win the Ted Lindsay or the Hart?It is not me saying this it is the reality of the hockey game.