No, he won't. Will be a black aceWait is he going to play? Guess we won’t know till tomorrow, just wonder who he’d slot in for.
Makes the most sense, guess it would depend on who looks the best in practice.No, he won't. Will be a black ace
If there is a top 6 injury, will be between him Deni and Hepo I guess
He's eligible because he was on the reserve list at the deadline, same reason Knies was eligible for the leafs.As I’ve just said a couple of posts before…
I think the whole scenario with the ATO and then the ELC was for the Panthers to not burn a year of his entry-level contract !
Signing as late as Samoskevich did means he isn’t eligible for playoffs IMO.
He won’t be black ace, he may get around the team, but he can’t be in that group if I got the rules right. He isn’t eligible.
He's eligible because he was on the reserve list at the deadline, same reason Knies was eligible for the leafs.
That's why I said I thought Samo was testing the waters to see if he was ready to make the jump. Or maybe it was a roster issue in Charlotte, dunno.Everything single player we draft is on our reserve-list… Reserve-list is the amount of players you have in your organisation… Signed or not (only drafted), number can go up to 90 !
But you’re right, it seems he is able to join our team for this run… I don’t get the whole ATO thing then… Really strange way of handling that business by Zito ! He must know something we don’t.
@mouser you mind helping us out with the Samo contract?
1) Seems to be a 3 year deal so it burns one year with no slide?
2) In your opinion, what are benefits of doing this?
You always seem to know CBA and contract stuff more than most on HF.
Thanks in advance.
Mackie is considered a age 20 signing, so his contract is not eligible to slide. The first year (2022-23) will thus burn.
Motivation for the player is to burn the year off the ELC, getting one year closer to their next contract.
Motivation for the team is if they think they might actually use him in the playoffs this season, or they don't really care about burning the ELC year.
The downside to burning a year rarely comes down to the ELC expiring earlier. If there is a negative it's usually burning that season of waiver exemption. For example Samo will be waiver exempt for 3 seasons 2022-23, 2023-24, 2024-25. Whereas if the contract started next year he'd be waiver exempt through 2025-26. (or 160 NHL games in either case)
Mackie is considered a age 20 signing, so his contract is not eligible to slide. The first year (2022-23) will thus burn.
Motivation for the player is to burn the year off the ELC, getting one year closer to their next contract.
Motivation for the team is if they think they might actually use him in the playoffs this season, or they don't really care about burning the ELC year.
The downside to burning a year rarely comes down to the ELC expiring earlier. If there is a negative it's usually burning that season of waiver exemption. For example Samo will be waiver exempt for 3 seasons 2022-23, 2023-24, 2024-25. Whereas if the contract started next year he'd be waiver exempt through 2025-26. (or 160 NHL games in either case)
Amazing: a follow up question.Mackie is considered a age 20 signing, so his contract is not eligible to slide. The first year (2022-23) will thus burn.
Motivation for the player is to burn the year off the ELC, getting one year closer to their next contract.
Motivation for the team is if they think they might actually use him in the playoffs this season, or they don't really care about burning the ELC year.
The downside to burning a year rarely comes down to the ELC expiring earlier. If there is a negative it's usually burning that season of waiver exemption. For example Samo will be waiver exempt for 3 seasons 2022-23, 2023-24, 2024-25. Whereas if the contract started next year he'd be waiver exempt through 2025-26. (or 160 NHL games in either case)
The only thing I can think of is that ATOs can play in the AHL playoffs and NHL guys can'tThat's why I said I thought Samo was testing the waters to see if he was ready to make the jump. Or maybe it was a roster issue in Charlotte, dunno.
Either way makes no difference now.
Thank you a lot for those details but situation is a little bit different… Or I mean… It’s not signing his deal to got us wondering…
The kid signed only an ATO out of college to finish the year with the Checkers Charlotte, and now that their season is done, he signed his ELC !
It is weird timing and weird process IMO. Have any idea why they did it like that ? Maybe it was a situation with the salary-cap and our pro-roster ?
Amazing: a follow up question.
Can a player that signs an ATO return to the NCAA?
That’s what I thought with KniesHe's eligible because he was on the reserve list at the deadline, same reason Knies was eligible for the leafs.
My sense is no: the AHL per diem likely would make him a professional under NCAA rules but not certain as wellIm not certain, but I don’t recall a NCAA player signing a ATO and later returning to college.