We keep revisiting the Tavares thing from time to time and I think (hopefully) we can all agree with the following statements:
1. Players often make general statements when asked about contract negotiations such as "I'm just focused on winning here" "I let my agent worry about that""If it works out I'd like to stay" and general open ended canned statements.
2. Tavares, went above and beyond the canned statements, to the point of almost being adamant that he was staying. It wasn't the typical speech in section 1, and that's what people have a problem with. Not that Tavares left. It's the way he left after saying what he did.
3. In scenario 1 I don't think anyone would call it lying to the press. Those statements can often still come out true, even if they don't resign. They could have still "wanted to win" with team A, but now want to win with team B.
The only reason I'm trying to summarize is because this stuff about Barzal and what he said really shouldn't be compared to Tavares. He's following the stuff that happens in point 1 and he's barely said anything about it to the actual press, if anything at all. He's in a position where he doesn't have many recourses anyway. Let's see what happens when he actually gets closer to UFA status. My guess is he'll still sound like the stuff in point 1, and if he leaves we'll be angry, annoyed, sad or whatever, but it won't be like it was with JT. I'm not sure any player has handled that worse (UFA, not a trade like Muller) or will ever handle it that badly again.