Again, this is a fallacy and an emotional rather than logical take. Leaf players win plenty of polls here. What happens to the trend in those cases?
Here's how it works;
Some random star from one of the other 30 teams has a string of 20 great games or so, and suddenly is pitted in a poll against a leaf counter part. Leaf players win polls when it's lopsided to hell and when the argument is even relatively close, it's ALWAYS the non leaf player who wins.
It's why I don't take any of this serious at all. And you can see that in how ridiculous my reasoning for my votes even in this old poll.
Tavaras was a top 5 center in a poll not 6 months before he bolted to Toronto. Then he became a fringe top 15.
I've already exposed the fallacy in logic in voting Dahlin over Rielly. To vote Dahlin you need to project his future potential, but you are not allowed project Rielly's year end numbers because if you do, then he will equal what you are likely to project for Dahlin's future and if you do that...then you have to concede that Rielly is currently what Dahlin hopes to become. Once you do that...the vote becomes a non argument.
At anyrate...I'm not suprised. I get the leaf hate. I enjoy it actually. Makes me giggle.