Not a good source. These guys said McDavid demanded a trade.
Not a legitimate source, but the claim does seem reasonable. I think Marleau approving a trade to San Jose and the Leafs retaining half of his salary is the most likely outcome that involves Marleau not being on Toronto to open next year. I still think it's way more likely that he's back next year, though.
Not a legitimate source, but the claim does seem reasonable. I think Marleau approving a trade to San Jose and the Leafs retaining half of his salary is the most likely outcome that involves Marleau not being on Toronto to open next year. I still think it's way more likely that he's back next year, though.
I've never seen someone continually be wrong and keep giving definitive statements, bravo!I can't see San Jose wanting to waste even the $3 million cap space if he is 50% retained. The Sharks aren't in a position to carry that much dead cap space.
The Leafs made their bed by giving out terrible contacts. They're going to have to sleep in this one next year for sure.
Completely agreed. Though a dollar for dollar swap of Marleau <-> Braun could make some sense
I find it hard to believe San Jose wants anything to do with a player who father time has caught up with .
I mean that would be the best solution for Leafs, but why is Marleau giving up on his last chance at the Cup exactly?
Who is this source? Are they credible?
Those leadership keys are firmly in Tavares’ hands btw
Are you adding your 1st rounder on top of that? Because Marleau certainly doesn't have any value, especially not to the point of getting Braun back for him.
Marleau's still a fine 3rd liner and being paid $3.25 million for a 1 year 3rd liner isn't bad. If they're up against the cap, that may present issues (don't know their cap situation), but Marleau at $3.25 million in theory isn't a problem. It's like the Penguins having Chris Kunitz at $3.85 million in 2016-2017, that's not a problem unless you absolutely need cap space for other things.