Holmes, Poirot, Miss Marple, Nancy Drew, Hardy Boys - detectives do not have to be cops.
I didn't say otherwise. I said that
most detectives are cops, and the U.S Bureau of Labor Statistics backs that up by listing
100,000 police detectives and only
30,000 private investigators, so, naturally, most detective shows involve cops. I get that you're tired of police detective shows, but repeating that detectives don't have to be cops isn't any kind of argument against police detective shows. There's a lot of fiction that features private investigators, too. In fact, you just proved it by listing several.
I get that you like the show, but cops, especially American cops, are bad. Their true function is to protect rich people's property. We don't need them valorized in our fiction.
Protecting the property of the "rich people" of Easttown didn't seem to be Mare's function. She mainly investigated a murder and a couple of kidnappings and risked her life doing it. What's bad about that and why should such important work not be valorized? I asked before and you said that that's not what cops do, except with very rare exceptions; however, I just pointed out that there are 100,000 police detectives in the U.S., out of a total 700,000 officers. 1 out of every 7 is hardly very rare. I get that you don't think too highly of some, but why would you paint 700,000 with a "bad" brush
and have a problem with shows centered around the ones doing good work? If it's because you believe that it excuses the bad ones, that seems irrational, and if you don't want
any cops to look good, that seems prejudicial. Honestly, it seems like the issue is that you're anti-cop, not that the show is pro-cop. No one else seems to think that it's "copaganda" or that Mare is valorized too much, and I imagine that we have posters of all beliefs here, which I think speaks to how relatively balanced the show is. BTW, how much I liked it doesn't have anything to do with my argument. You thought that it was a "pretty good show," as well.