How many times can you give marginal players a full year in the NHL to see what happens?
I get it, defenders take longer to mature. But you can't be patient with everybody. The team needs to make a decision on who has a future and who doesn't. Does Kindl belong here? Smith? Quincey? Is XO favored or Marchenko? They'll need to take a stance and clear out the logjam.
The problem is that Holland hasn't made clearing out the log jam easy. Kindl should've never been given four years, and Smith should've gotten one. Ouellet, Marchenko, Jensen and Sproul all lose their waiver exemption after this upcoming season. However, barring a trade (the kind that Holland
never makes), they'll have one opening on the blueline
IF Quincey walks as a UFA. If you recall, Holland apparently tried to pawn off Kindl last season, but no one was interested (strange, considering Edmonton had to overpay to get guys like Nikitin and Fayne...).
And yes, I said
IF Quincey walks. Red Wings fans are acting like it's a given that Quincey will be gone after this season. I would be careful with this type of assumption. Remember when they made the same one about Cleary two summers ago? When Nyquist was supposed to be a regular and the team already had too many forwards?
My bold prediction right here, is that if Quincey has a solid season and Brendub Smindl don't improve over last season, Holland will panic re-sign Quincey again and leave the four previously mentioned prospects to chance on waivers. He'll say his usual crap about "can't having enough depth" and blah blah. WATCH.
Anybody remember that one season, I think it was 2007-08 where the Wings won some big shiny bowl looking trophy thing? They actually went through 75% of that regular season with 4 of their 7 dmen making $1M or less. 2 of which were at or near league minimum. Strange...