WingsMJN2965
Registered User
- Oct 13, 2017
- 18,106
- 17,699
It is crazy Mantha is already 26. At one point do people stop thinking about potential and ceiling? Guy can’t stay healthy and has never broken 50 points.
Reinhart is younger, scores more, same ppg, better defensively, and healthier. But he plays with eichel so he gets a -20
the best polls are ones where someone is clearly in an argument and is fishing to have people agree with them
You've also provided zero evidence that Reinhart is better defensively in this thread or the other, but continue saying it.
9/10 this is just something people say.
You realize Reinhart is only a year younger, right? So I guess Reinhart has way more room to grow than Mantha, somehow?
You already got wrecked on the scoring pace, the only thing that puts Reinhart ahead in total scoring is Mantha's injuries. You've also provided zero evidence that Reinhart is better defensively in this thread or the other, but continue saying it.
Turns out I didn't have to look too hard. Shooting fish in a barrel... With a cannon.
Nope reinhart is exactly where he will be, I don’t think he’ll be anything more than what he is. A good 50-60 point two-way winger.
we will see if mantha’s production ever gets close to the legend of mantha.
Cool. Now support your conclusion that Reinhart is better defensively.
Reinharts the better player overall, but if i had a McDavid, Draisaitl, Eichel, Matthews, etc center i'd want Mantha beside them for his scoring potential.
If you have a one dimensional center or star winger and you want to help insulate them then a Reinhart, Lindholm, Silfverberg, Landeskog, etc complete player would be more suited than Mantha to do that while also complimenting talent. Think of it this was. If you have a star center, you'd want both players to flank that center to create a solid line, Mantha being a cheap(comparatively) big finisher and Reinhart being a 200ft complete player, I don't necessarily value one more than the other as I think theyre very close but Reinhart is the "better" player in this situation.I don't think Rienhart is better, but you do bring up a good point. The idea here is neither player is one to build on, they're complimentary top-6 forwards. One being a winger and the other more of a center/wing, I think if you had a superstar center, Mantha is a much more appealing option of the two and would be overall across the league. On the other hand if you had weak centers but a superstar like Ovie on the wing, I doubt Reinhart would be a hot commodity.
If you have a one dimensional center or star winger and you want to help insulate them then a Reinhart, Lindholm, Silfverberg, Landeskog, etc complete player would be more suited than Mantha to do that while also complimenting talent. Think of it this was. If you have a star center, you'd want both players to flank that center to create a solid line, Mantha being a cheap(comparatively) big finisher and Reinhart being a 200ft complete player, I don't necessarily value one more than the other as I think theyre very close but Reinhart is the "better" player in this situation.
Other than the pre-draft "profile" of what Reinhart was supposed to be, where is the idea that he's this solid 200ft two-way player in the realm of guys like Lindholm and Landeskog even coming from? I haven't seen that from him. He hasn't really been that player in the real world.
They are both just sorta different flavours of complementary Top-6 Winger...but i haven't seen enough of this "two way acumen" out of Reinhart to actually even think about making that the tipping point. Neither is a particularly good defensive player. The slightly better passer/playmaker? Maybe. But as a complementary winger...i don't think that comes close to outweighing the significant advantages to Mantha elsewhere.
Nope reinhart is exactly where he will be, I don’t think he’ll be anything more than what he is. A good 50-60 point two-way winger.
we will see if mantha’s production ever gets close to the legend of mantha.
I used to think this as well but Mantha might end up being another guy who looks way better at times than he actually was.Reinhart is a great player but Mantha’s offensive ceiling - not even speaking long-term, just on any given night - is among the best in the NHL. If he played with a Barzal, Eichel, Pettersson, etc. I think 50 goals would be more likely than not.
You realize Reinhart is only a year younger, right? So I guess Reinhart has way more room to grow than Mantha, somehow?
You already got wrecked on the scoring pace, the only thing that puts Reinhart ahead in total scoring is Mantha's injuries. You've also provided zero evidence that Reinhart is better defensively in this thread or the other, but continue saying it.
Turns out I didn't have to look too hard. Shooting fish in a barrel... With a cannon.
Reinhart is completely dependent on Eichel to produce, and considering how dominant Eichel is that production even with Eichel is still disappointing.