Bleach Clean
Registered User
- Aug 9, 2006
- 27,055
- 6,624
Continue here.
Previous Thread 1: Management Thread - Read OP
Previous Thread 2: Management Thread II - Read OP
Previous Thread 3: Management Thread III (MOD Warning Post # 67)
Last quote from previous thread:
Previous Thread 1: Management Thread - Read OP
Previous Thread 2: Management Thread II - Read OP
Previous Thread 3: Management Thread III (MOD Warning Post # 67)
Last quote from previous thread:
You can, but then you cannot take better team performance as an indicator of GM impact either.
This is the implication of saying the GM would have had zero impact on the team’s cycle, regardless of who that GM would have been. That it was going to go this way anyways. Right?
Next, when a team is bad for a long time, it inevitably accrues talent at the top of the draft. Inevitably, it gets better. Because cycles, right?
Last, Benning has done a poor job since being hired = He should be fired, correct?
Last edited: