Come on man. When we picked an anglo and we make a mistake, it's a bad pick...but when we pick a franco and it's a bad pick, it's politics? Why can't he be...a bad pick? And what about the list? So Leblanc appeared at #9 simply on politics yet...why does Kreider only appears on the acceptable list? And not even 1st on the list?
Besides, everybody had him in the 1st round. And not just as mock drafts because Habs would be picking locals. He was scheduled to go around that pick.
The draft was in Montreal.. come on, we all knew what the narrative was going into the draft. The Habs brass were under a ridiculous amount of ridicule for picking americans..
Remember the '07 Draft? RDS had an article calling us the Montreal Americans. Then they had a huge front page article for Fortier.. "Bienevenue a MTL, Olivier Fortier!!"
Funny enough, he was, what the worst selection we made in the draft?
There was criticism for Fisher (rightly in the end but at the time, he was a project and the book was yet to be written).
In 08 we took Kristo.
So, what happened going into 09? Well, we acquired Tanguay the summer before.. Gainey tried to go full ****** to acquire Lecavalier. Which, thankfully, didn't happen. The centennial season was in full swing and after the disastrous end, we had the draft in Montreal.
Leblanc was a quebec player projected 1st round.. and he was playing in the USHL going to the NCAA. The story wrote itself. If he was on the board. The Habs, being enslaved to politics, as they were and still are, could not pass up on Leblanc with him on the board. For **** sakes, they chanted his stupid name when they selected him. The look on his face said it all.. the guy wasn't built for this.
It was a bad pick. Politics played into it. Take politics out of it and it's still a horrendous pick. I'm just tired of people trying to defend the selection, on either side of the debate. Any person with two eyes and watched him play saw that he didn't have a stand out skill. Those guys don't make it very often.