He's .800 since US Thanksgiving and .917 in his last dozen games...What's that closer to?
That's a great stretch, which I've said multiple times. But that's 10-11 games out of 38. So a third to a quarter of the season, he's produced at a good rate. The rest of the season he's under produced, and when you average it out, it's about what he did last year, no? .61 to .63 PPG.
So again, good stretch, hope it continues, but is it really logical to say "this is the Eriksson we expected" when he's on par statistically with a season from last year that was universally regarded as bad, regardless of what reason you attribute it to? That's what I take issue with. Not that people are happy with this latest stretch, but to make a prognostication that he's been the guy we expected, all while he's doing the same as the last 2 seasons, production wise, well that's not true. He's been good over the last month. He's played better, but produced at the same rate when looked at in it's entirety. So I find the announcement that he's the guy we expected to be premature.
And again, if he keeps it up, I fully expect those PPG numbers to rise, which is why I said worry about that at the end of the season. Just enjoy the good hockey he's played and hope it continues, because the team needs him to produce.