Lou appreciation thread

MJ65

Registered User
Jul 12, 2009
16,376
2,233
Toronto
You have to put a value on the cap relief bud. Besides Zaitsev might just help that scenario out in a pleasant surprise for everyone. That was a good trade for the leafs.

How is this trade connected to Zaitsev's signing? does not make any sense
 

Hero

Uncle Leo
Jul 2, 2009
20,826
0
heropuck.wordpress.com
I am not happy with Dion's trade - we just got a 2nd round pick and a prospect. Ottawa won this trade

We should at least have acquired a 1st round pick

If his contract was 1-2 years shorter or if he was 1-2 years younger, he would of.


Those last 2 years of Phaneufs deal will hurt
 

Faltorvo

Registered User
Feb 18, 2008
21,067
1,941
The value they got for Kessel sounds about right.

oh i think ACC is absolutely 100% dead wrong

see what kessel is doing this year, in a deeper line up with two super stud Cs at his disposal?

picture trying to market him now

during back to back bad years, "YIKES":amazed:

we just got rid of fat fill in time.

the illusion was starting to wear off
 
Last edited:

Faltorvo

Registered User
Feb 18, 2008
21,067
1,941
I am not happy with Dion's trade - we just got a 2nd round pick and a prospect. Ottawa won this trade

We should at least have acquired a 1st round pick

we got way more then what the 7 million dollar fraud is worth

we managed to walk away scott free from that horrific contract
 

LeafsNation75

Registered User
Jan 15, 2010
37,975
12,506
Toronto, Ontario
I am not happy with Dion's trade - we just got a 2nd round pick and a prospect. Ottawa won this trade

We should at least have acquired a 1st round pick
Honestly I'm just as happy that Toronto did not have to retain any of his salary for another 5 years, so because of that I'm ok with not getting a 1st round pick for him.
 

Aceboogie

Registered User
Aug 25, 2012
32,649
3,896
EDM fan, but here to praise Lou and give my thoughts on potential rebuilding strategies

1st off- Signing UFAS in July and boosting their value in the year and selling them off for picks is a great strategy. Basically free picks. Leafs now have no bad contracts on the books and a wealth of picks.

2nd- Development of Nylander is top notch. Leave him in minors to dominate

Here are my thoughts on rebuilding moves so the Leafs will avoid falling down the rebuild blackhole like some teams before them

1) One of biggest issues with rebuilding teams is that they have little vet help to shelter young players. Young players go through rough patches and need to be sheltered. Development can be stunted if they are exposed to much

One strategy I think would be good would be to pick up overpaid vets on 1 or 2 year deals and pick up an asset to off load them. Say Smid + 4th for 7th. Hes signed for one more year only, and his cap hit really doesnt matter. So they get a vet to help the young D and also get a pick. He could be moved next deadline too for a lower pick. So 2 free assets

2) Trading down in the draft after the 2nd round. This is a strategy Shanny did last year and it seems to work. MacT (in a rare good move) did this in 2013 too. You trade a 3rd round pick for a 4th,5th and maybe 7th. Drafting after the 2nd is largely a luck game, and more picks you get, the better chance theyll pan out. Instead of having 6 picks after top 90, you can have 12-14. You then just wait for 3-4 years to see where they are at before signing best ones

Anywho, rebuild is headed is right direction, those are only minor things I could see Lou doing that would make things better
 

Stephen

Moderator
Feb 28, 2002
79,010
53,949
All the UFA for picks moves the Leafs have engaged in the past two deadlines more than makes up for the missed opportunities with Kulemin, Raymond and company.
 

ACC1224

Super Elite, Passing ALL Tests since 2002
Aug 19, 2002
73,962
39,664
With the way Kessel is playing, I think we were lucky to get what we did.

Didn't Lou Lam come in the summer? I'm not suggesting they should have waited until now for Lou to trade him, just a few more weeks.
 

Wafflewhipper

Registered User
Jan 18, 2014
14,114
5,694
How is this trade connected to Zaitsev's signing? does not make any sense

Dude you don't make any sense. You want to keep phaneuf and his years of terrible cap hit in a rebuild and don't know who Zaitsev is???
 

burpsalot

Registered User
Feb 12, 2015
5,633
0
Didn't Lou Lam come in the summer? I'm not suggesting they should have waited until now for Lou to trade him, just a few more weeks.


Only 8 teams on Phil's list. Pittsburgh was the only team that had an interest in Kessel. There was a time constraint. If the deal wasn't going to be completed that day, they would have changed their strategy & acquired their "new" player in the Free Agent market. Shanahan advised other teams a deal was about to be made & if anyone wanted to make a bid, it was now or never. No one else was interested.
 

Leaf19

Registered User
Dec 25, 2013
637
32
He's definitely exceeded expecations so far. I think NJ ownership really handcuffed him the last 5 or so years and now he's showing he's still got it.

Only thing left is for him to find a way out of having to give up the two 3rd rounders :laugh: I wouldn't be surprised if he finds a way to Robidas the compensation. Maybe he stalls until the last moment and convinces Bettman to give those teams supplementary picks? Either way, it'll be an unfortunate set of circumstances... no one's fault.
 

keon

Registered User
Nov 9, 2002
861
0
Visit site
Trading Polak and Spalling and getting 2 second-round picks, without taking salary back - nice
Getting Robidas off the books this year - nice
Trading Phaneuf without taking salary back - nicer

Again please explain how Robidas is off the books. I believe he is still on and is not LTIR.
 

TankNationTillDeath

Pylon4Sale
Jan 10, 2014
788
0
Toronto
If anyone deserves an appreciation thread so far it's Lieweke :p, actually kidding, but Shanahan is the real cause.

He's been the busiest man in sports since being named back in april 2014..

Fired Carlyle, Nonis, training staff, assisstant coaches, marlies coaches, pulin, loiselle etc etc

Hired Hunter, Dubas, Babcock, Lou, Pridham, and all the replacements...

The guy will go down as the most influential Leaf of all time if this works out.
 

ITM

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe...
Jan 26, 2012
4,575
2,551
If Kessel had gotten hot a lot of GM's would have looked at Kessel at $5.75M(Leafs are eating $1.25M) U.S. They simply gambled he would suck, if you can't play with Crosby and Malkin, you know you are garbage. Point being if he scored 40 they could have used him and traded him for more than what we got, and their pick is protected something we were never allowed by a US/NHL lawyer type.

The Phil Kessel trade to Pittsburgh wasn't merely about the material assets gained, but most certainly about management sending the message that Kessel's brand of "professionalism" was a thing of the past. That the trade happened in the same conference and on July 1st shouldn't be seen as incidental. He wasn't moved or traded so much as removed, expelled, banished.

There should be no doubt that every possibility wasn't considered, including having Mike Babcock maximize Kessel's worth.

There was more importance placed on the deadline date of July 1st and Kessel's absence more than any additional asset that might be gained, July 2nd and beyond.
 

ACC1224

Super Elite, Passing ALL Tests since 2002
Aug 19, 2002
73,962
39,664
Only 8 teams on Phil's list. Pittsburgh was the only team that had an interest in Kessel. There was a time constraint. If the deal wasn't going to be completed that day, they would have changed their strategy & acquired their "new" player in the Free Agent market. Shanahan advised other teams a deal was about to be made & if anyone wanted to make a bid, it was now or never. No one else was interested.

The Phil Kessel trade to Pittsburgh wasn't merely about the material assets gained, but most certainly about management sending the message that Kessel's brand of "professionalism" was a thing of the past. That the trade happened in the same conference and on July 1st shouldn't be seen as incidental. He wasn't moved or traded so much as removed, expelled, banished.

There should be no doubt that every possibility wasn't considered, including having Mike Babcock maximize Kessel's worth.

There was more importance placed on the deadline date of July 1st and Kessel's absence more than any additional asset that might be gained, July 2nd and beyond.

Possibly but not absolutely.
 

Jmo89

Registered User
Mar 21, 2010
4,405
3,910
If Kessel had gotten hot a lot of GM's would have looked at Kessel at $5.75M(Leafs are eating $1.25M) U.S. They simply gambled he would suck, if you can't play with Crosby and Malkin, you know you are garbage. Point being if he scored 40 they could have used him and traded him for more than what we got, and their pick is protected something we were never allowed by a US/NHL lawyer type.

Isn't Kessel's salary 8M before retention? I think your off by a mil.
 

TheCLAM

Registered User
Oct 11, 2012
3,945
149
Niagara Falls
Trading Polak and Spalling and getting 2 second-round picks, without taking salary back - nice
Getting Robidas off the books this year - nice
Trading Phaneuf without taking salary back - nicer

Robidas is off the books next year, he signed a 3 year deal
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad