mikeyz
Registered User
- Dec 3, 2013
- 7,332
- 6,385
Amassing picks is probably the easiest part of the rebuild, more or less. It's what you do with them that will dictate how it goes going forward.
This!
Amassing picks is probably the easiest part of the rebuild, more or less. It's what you do with them that will dictate how it goes going forward.
You have to put a value on the cap relief bud. Besides Zaitsev might just help that scenario out in a pleasant surprise for everyone. That was a good trade for the leafs.
I am not happy with Dion's trade - we just got a 2nd round pick and a prospect. Ottawa won this trade
We should at least have acquired a 1st round pick
The value they got for Kessel sounds about right.
I am not happy with Dion's trade - we just got a 2nd round pick and a prospect. Ottawa won this trade
We should at least have acquired a 1st round pick
Honestly I'm just as happy that Toronto did not have to retain any of his salary for another 5 years, so because of that I'm ok with not getting a 1st round pick for him.I am not happy with Dion's trade - we just got a 2nd round pick and a prospect. Ottawa won this trade
We should at least have acquired a 1st round pick
Not complaining but it's hard not to think Lou Lam couldn't have done better.
With the way Kessel is playing, I think we were lucky to get what we did.
He's been proactive for sure.
Phaneuf/Polak/Matthias/Spaling gone before the deadline. I like it.
How is this trade connected to Zaitsev's signing? does not make any sense
Didn't Lou Lam come in the summer? I'm not suggesting they should have waited until now for Lou to trade him, just a few more weeks.
Trading Polak and Spalling and getting 2 second-round picks, without taking salary back - nice
Getting Robidas off the books this year - nice
Trading Phaneuf without taking salary back - nicer
If Kessel had gotten hot a lot of GM's would have looked at Kessel at $5.75M(Leafs are eating $1.25M) U.S. They simply gambled he would suck, if you can't play with Crosby and Malkin, you know you are garbage. Point being if he scored 40 they could have used him and traded him for more than what we got, and their pick is protected something we were never allowed by a US/NHL lawyer type.
I want Dubas to spend so much time around Lou that he picks up his accent.
Only 8 teams on Phil's list. Pittsburgh was the only team that had an interest in Kessel. There was a time constraint. If the deal wasn't going to be completed that day, they would have changed their strategy & acquired their "new" player in the Free Agent market. Shanahan advised other teams a deal was about to be made & if anyone wanted to make a bid, it was now or never. No one else was interested.
The Phil Kessel trade to Pittsburgh wasn't merely about the material assets gained, but most certainly about management sending the message that Kessel's brand of "professionalism" was a thing of the past. That the trade happened in the same conference and on July 1st shouldn't be seen as incidental. He wasn't moved or traded so much as removed, expelled, banished.
There should be no doubt that every possibility wasn't considered, including having Mike Babcock maximize Kessel's worth.
There was more importance placed on the deadline date of July 1st and Kessel's absence more than any additional asset that might be gained, July 2nd and beyond.
If Kessel had gotten hot a lot of GM's would have looked at Kessel at $5.75M(Leafs are eating $1.25M) U.S. They simply gambled he would suck, if you can't play with Crosby and Malkin, you know you are garbage. Point being if he scored 40 they could have used him and traded him for more than what we got, and their pick is protected something we were never allowed by a US/NHL lawyer type.
Isn't Kessel's salary 8M before retention? I think your off by a mil.
Trading Polak and Spalling and getting 2 second-round picks, without taking salary back - nice
Getting Robidas off the books this year - nice
Trading Phaneuf without taking salary back - nicer
With the way Kessel is playing, I think we were lucky to get what we did.