Hey everybody, I'm new to the forums but I've been looking on HF for a while now.
One of the things I've thought the most about this season, among other fans I'm sure, is how the 2012 draft turned out for us. Notably with one of our top prospects in Forsberg being dumped almost immediately, but with the selection of Tom Wilson over a guy like Olli Maatta.
Now this isn't by any means bashing Tom Wilson or the fact that we picked him..I think he is going to be a solid player down the road and I love that we got a tough, hard-nosed player like him that we needed so badly. So this has nothing to do with him. But, I remember waiting for that 16th pick in the draft and hoping that after Forsberg, that specifically Faksa would drop to us. But once he got scooped, I had remembered hearing quite a bit of hype leading up to the draft about Maatta. I admit I really didn't know much of anything about Wilson when we picked him, but I was a little upset that we didn't grab Maatta with that pick.
Obviously it wasn't really a big deal because it turns out Wilson is a pretty good prospect in his own right. However, the question I'm trying to get at here is this: How do you think this year's team would be different with Maatta over Wilson? I am solely basing this question off of how Oates is utilizing Wilson because let's be honest, he would probably be much better suited in juniors as opposed to skating ~6 minutes a night with plugs like Beagle, Volpatti, etc.
Hopefully I don't come off as stupid since I'm new around here, it's just something that has intrigued me. Obviously this team has a lot more problems than just one player, I'm not blind enough to see that this team would need a lot more than a 19 year old defenseman to be a true contender. But strictly speaking, where do you think we would be right now, this season, with defensive lines along the likes of:
Alzner-Carlson
Maatta-Green
Orlov-Hillen/Carrick, etc...
...as opposed to just throwing a 19 year old on the 4th line to fight and hit for the most part as Oates is doing now.
One of the things I've thought the most about this season, among other fans I'm sure, is how the 2012 draft turned out for us. Notably with one of our top prospects in Forsberg being dumped almost immediately, but with the selection of Tom Wilson over a guy like Olli Maatta.
Now this isn't by any means bashing Tom Wilson or the fact that we picked him..I think he is going to be a solid player down the road and I love that we got a tough, hard-nosed player like him that we needed so badly. So this has nothing to do with him. But, I remember waiting for that 16th pick in the draft and hoping that after Forsberg, that specifically Faksa would drop to us. But once he got scooped, I had remembered hearing quite a bit of hype leading up to the draft about Maatta. I admit I really didn't know much of anything about Wilson when we picked him, but I was a little upset that we didn't grab Maatta with that pick.
Obviously it wasn't really a big deal because it turns out Wilson is a pretty good prospect in his own right. However, the question I'm trying to get at here is this: How do you think this year's team would be different with Maatta over Wilson? I am solely basing this question off of how Oates is utilizing Wilson because let's be honest, he would probably be much better suited in juniors as opposed to skating ~6 minutes a night with plugs like Beagle, Volpatti, etc.
Hopefully I don't come off as stupid since I'm new around here, it's just something that has intrigued me. Obviously this team has a lot more problems than just one player, I'm not blind enough to see that this team would need a lot more than a 19 year old defenseman to be a true contender. But strictly speaking, where do you think we would be right now, this season, with defensive lines along the likes of:
Alzner-Carlson
Maatta-Green
Orlov-Hillen/Carrick, etc...
...as opposed to just throwing a 19 year old on the 4th line to fight and hit for the most part as Oates is doing now.