Are they still meeting?
The NBA's cap froze or grew for two seasons. http://www.cbafaq.com/salarycap.htm#Q13
The NFL has guaranteed that players will earn 99% of the Cap for two years until the floors are set at 89% of the Cap in 2013.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/30/per-team-spending-minimum-doesnt-apply-until-2013/
That 47% you talked about for the NFL is actually the minimum the players will earn, not the maximum that teams will pay.
A little tidbit on declining attendance for various sports franchises:
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/...ns-houston-astros-arizona-diamondbacks-112912
You will notice that MLB far and away has the most teams on the list. Yeah, that's the model to follow.
Ya really.
But they aren't designed for parity in any sense of the term. The fans take notice and move on. I'm glad the NHL won't go down that route, although changes are necessary.
By the way, from what I've read, the players have come into this prepared to weather the lockout, much like the owners did last time. Much of the union's time in the earlier part of the year was spent helping the players get their financial houses in order to do so. In other words, they're prepared to "come out of this poorer". It's not about money.
Yeah, the law always thinks outside of the box and refers to certain actions as completely different ones! Is this a lock-out, a strike, or has the league simply contracted all 30 teams and ceases to exist? It doesn't matter: They're all the same in the eyes of the law (and in the eyes of some in the public, apparently).
Yeah and we also watch the games and realize that there are already teams with barely any NHL level talent on them. Think of how great the product would be with more good players spread among less teams, it would be outstanding.
I don't think NHL hockey is good enough tbh, I think the league's biggest problem is the quality of play over an entire season, sure we get good games here and there and playoffs are usually entertaining, but it is hard to watch a lot of the regular season games.
So players, who have had their salaries be affected by escrow for the last seven years, this summer got the idea that they were going to be paid the nominal values in their contracts?
This "look at all the contracts they signed this summer" discussion is nonsense. They sign a lot of contracts every summer. That's when contracts are signed. Many of the big name UFAs the last couple have negotiated big signing bonuses because they know there is a big chance of the players salary share going down. The players and their agents know very well that contracts are regulated by the CBA.
The only questionable contracts signed were the 6-7 year RFA contracts (Boston, Edmonton) signed this summer and it's hard to argue that any player got screwed on those.
As a sound byte "why did they sign those contracts when they have no intention of honoring them" might convince the more impressionable of us but anyone with a clue knows that "honoring" is and will be regulated by the CBA.
Why should they have expected it to be impacted by the new CBA? In two lockouts last year, used so often as comparables, no one else's deals were affected detrimentally by their new CBA.
wow, you really dont get it.
its a joke... Saying they contracted all 30 teams. No more teams. No hockey being played. Not that hard to understand.
And it's something that really pisses me off. I get that they do not want their cheques to decrease by 10% (or whatever the math is when you go from 57% to 50%). However every SPC signed states that it's subject to the CBA. And as they all found out last time around... that could mean anything that both sides agree to.
So the PA giving themselves "delinked raises" is just part of the bargaining process, in your opinion?
Bettman is operating on a timeline regardless of what the NHLPA is saying, his bargaining style is to drag things out until what..Jan1 2012? Jan1, 2013? What really is behind this strategy is not so much to capitulate the NHLPA again but to 1) keep the owners in line to his control 2) punish the whole NHL hockey world because his sunbelt teams are unsuccessful.
Bettman is hijacking the system and he clearly has to go, and the Canadian teams especially need to take greater control of the game.
The only logically course of action for the players to take would be to simply not comply with Bettman's demands and let this drag as long as Bettman apparantly is wanting to go, this could take multiple years here. There is a market for high performance hockey players but the NHL in it's present intransigent form is the problem. Bettman has lost any sense of reality. Maybe the Canadian teams can split and form it's own NHL organization.
Bettman is operating on a timeline regardless of what the NHLPA is saying, his bargaining style is to drag things out until what..Jan1 2012? Jan1, 2013? What really is behind this strategy is not so much to capitulate the NHLPA again but to 1) keep the owners in line to his control 2) punish the whole NHL hockey world because his sunbelt teams are unsuccessful.
Bettman is hijacking the system and he clearly has to go, and the Canadian teams especially need to take greater control of the game.
The only logically course of action for the players to take would be to simply not comply with Bettman's demands and let this drag as long as Bettman apparantly is wanting to go, this could take multiple years here. There is a market for high performance hockey players but the NHL in it's present intransigent form is the problem. Bettman has lost any sense of reality. Maybe the Canadian teams can split and form it's own NHL organization.