For this post, you get to choose which pair of players you would take for the next 10 years.
For the sake of argument, each player gets the same level of training, equipment, nutrition, medicine etc.
Now here's the caveat. The first pair has obviously missed more time compared to the second pair in real time, and if I didn't specify this part, it would confuse others on who to vote, so here it is.
While the second pair plays all the 82 games each year for the next 10 years, the first pair only play 72 games each year for the next 10 years.
In other words:
First pair: (72 games * 10 seasons) + (72 games * 10 seasons) = 1440 total games
Second pair: (82 games * 10 seasons) + (82 games * 10 seasons) = 1640 total games
So given the data, which pair of players would you take for the next 10 years.
For the sake of argument, each player gets the same level of training, equipment, nutrition, medicine etc.
Now here's the caveat. The first pair has obviously missed more time compared to the second pair in real time, and if I didn't specify this part, it would confuse others on who to vote, so here it is.
While the second pair plays all the 82 games each year for the next 10 years, the first pair only play 72 games each year for the next 10 years.
In other words:
First pair: (72 games * 10 seasons) + (72 games * 10 seasons) = 1440 total games
Second pair: (82 games * 10 seasons) + (82 games * 10 seasons) = 1640 total games
So given the data, which pair of players would you take for the next 10 years.