ULF_55
Moderator
I mean... usually it's the hometown game that has sound on.
Yes, but there are more than 7 cities with bars.
But I know what you're saying...
I mean... usually it's the hometown game that has sound on.
I don't know what you guys are talking about, Hughson isn't a Canucks fan, if anything he's a Leafs fan, don't you remember for many years he was the voice of the Blue Jays. His broadcasting career has involves Toronto teams.
Possible but it depends if they need a goalie.
Timing it well would also be a good plan.
I got a good laugh out of that one. Marner completely dangles and outsmuscles boeser yet somehow in hughson backwards world boeser was the shining star on that play
And the whole production is pretty f-up too, they showed the Vancouver skyline just before the puck drop when the game was in Toronto. No wonder why most HNIC Leafs games this year didn't draw much viewerships at all(mostly under 900k per game, while 2.5 million watched WJH on TSN)
The funny thing is if Sparks is waived he will get claimed, and if he gets claimed and Hutch ****s the bed the same bunch will harp on Dubas for ruining their goalie depth
Kapanen can play both LW and RW. Bracco is pure RW and nothing else.
He's third on the team for shots on goal behind Tavares and Marner. But at least they score goals. Wasn't he leading the universe in shots on goal last year or was it the year prior?Is there a stat that measures puck hog ness ?
A puck hog takes shots from areas you don't score from.
Kadri has always been a puck hog. Either he's gonna score, or nobody is.
I don't like Kapenen with Kadri, hes snake bit (kadri) hogging puck losing it..no one can set Kap up for the speed entry I'd prefer Kap Matthew's, JT Marner Johsson..I think Kapnis with Kadri to balance the attack but that line has no ozone time and marleaus lost his offensive game huge but his leadership etc is still good to have. Though I don't think he will be around next year due to his contract
Hyman is on the Tavares line, just thought you should knowthe way mango scored with a snipe i would never expect hyman to pull that move EVER
and a few times before a goal, before and after Dzone face-off's, post commercial breaks and after each time Hughson misidentified a Leaf, but not after Simpson called the great save made by Marchement...are they drunk every broadcast?Only after each goal.
This exact same ******** happened to me last weekend to watch Islanders/Leafs. Went to a "sports bar" and asked for the volume to be turned up, the waitress supervisor wouldnt turn it up, just sat there drinking whatever **** drink he had and talking to people at the bar.When did not having sound on at the bar become a thing? ...in the day, bars always had sound for the Jays and Leafs. Even hotel bars.... last time I was in TO I had to beg to have sound.
1st agreed strongly on Moore. He has stolen Ennis spot.That's not going to happen, as soon as Hyman is fit he's coming off IR and Sparks+Andersen are already practicing with the team
Either Hutchinson goes down or Sparks goes on waivers very shortly, **** I want to keep Moore around as well
The asset management way says send down Hutchinson so you don't lose Sparks, I'm not sure Babcock cares about that however
1st agreed strongly on Moore. He has stolen Ennis spot.
I understand the asset management but I agree with @Cor about the best man gets the job so we don't have to overplay Andersen.
Dubas needs to understand that if the coach is happy with the backup situation he will play him more and save Andie.
I feel like Freddy likes to play as much as possible, and that's why he starts so often. if he wanted a rest, I'm sure Babcock would go with another goalieLast season Babcock had a backup with a 930sv% and still played Andersen a ton
I think it's just how Babcock's wired, he wants the starter to play a ton so that wouldn't really come into it for me
It's pure asset management, is losing Sparks for nothing acceptable? When you can just send Hutchinson down?
I'd hang onto Sparks but I'm not to concerned either way, I don't think either guy is very good so meh
I feel like Freddy likes to play as much as possible, and that's why he starts so often. if he wanted a rest, I'm sure Babcock would go with another goalie
IF Hutch is the better goalie? Take the risk. The goal is to make the team better.Last season Babcock had a backup with a 930sv% and still played Andersen a ton
I think it's just how Babcock's wired, he wants the starter to play a ton so that wouldn't really come into it for me
It's pure asset management, is losing Sparks for nothing acceptable? When you can just send Hutchinson down?
I'd hang onto Sparks but I'm not to concerned either way, I don't think either guy is very good so meh
IF Hutch is the better goalie? Take the risk. The goal is to make the team better.
As for Babcock overplaying Anderson when we had McE, I don't know, but I know it's a good thing to have a goalie in the flow going into the post season.
Maybe last year is a learning year for Babcock?
IF Hutch is the better goalie? Take the risk. The goal is to make the team better.
As for Babcock overplaying Anderson when we had McE, I don't know, but I know it's a good thing to have a goalie in the flow going into the post season.
Maybe last year is a learning year for Babcock?
Kiwi thinks Andersen was really overworked during the season and the playoffs and yet he went on to be a stud at the World Championships.
I noticed after you insulted me because I schooled you, so i figured i owed you more cheap shot, its fair?Is he better? He looks more technically sound but his numbers aren't exactly impressive, that's still a giant red flag for me
Does your starter need to play 66 regular season games when your playoff situation was sorted by early January?
Maybe if your fighting for your playoff life but not in that situation, we had the opportunity to give him rest and refused to take it
I hope he's learned some lessons but we've played the crap out of Andersen this season as well, Sparks has only played on b2b nights and when Andersen has been injured, it's just not enough imo
I thought we agreed to give this argument up after you realized how great my argument was and that you were wrong
It's not an outlandish idea. 60+ games for the first time in a career is pretty significantKiwi thinks Andersen was really overworked during the season and the playoffs and yet he went on to be a stud at the World Championships.
Goalies are so random that I can't say either way. I agree playing 60+ games is heavy, especially for the first time in your career.Is he better? He looks more technically sound but his numbers aren't exactly impressive, that's still a giant red flag for me
Does your starter need to play 66 regular season games when your playoff situation was sorted by early January?
Maybe if your fighting for your playoff life but not in that situation, we had the opportunity to give him rest and refused to take it
I hope he's learned some lessons but we've played the crap out of Andersen this season as well, Sparks has only played on b2b nights and when Andersen has been injured, it's just not enough imo
I thought we agreed to give this argument up after you realized how great my argument was and that you were wrong
Goalies are so random that I can't say either way. I agree playing 60+ games is heavy, especially for the first time in your career.
It's such an elusive debate
I'm with you thereIn today's game it's very difficult to justify your starter playing 66 games, that's a lot of hockey
I think he likes work but resting him in the middle of the season and ramping his workload up late in the season so he gets the game time he needs but only plays 60 odd games makes more sense