This is where the "pro-fighting" crowd instantly takes this discussion for some reason.
Not having played the sport at a certain level doesn't mean you can't be against fighting as a payback for a clean hit or in this case an injury nobody even seems to know when or how it happened.
Maybe you're busy playing the sport and not seeing how radically different it is from just 5 years ago and not even close to what it was 10 years ago. And barely the same sport as 15 years ago when hits getting people into the Hall of Fame are now deemed head hunting and illegal.
What would having a tough guy or team of them done to help Jake Gardiner or Dermott?
Or does someone who has never played at a high level need to start naming off all the injuries caused by trying to stick up for people? Or the embarrassing incidents such as Bertuzzi's and McSorley's that came from trying to get retribution for essentially initial incidents that were really nothing when viewed in hindsight?
We're down to a handful of rats in a league that used to be polluted with them. Fighting, hitting but also head injuries and long term injuries overall have never been fewer then in this NHL right now that is faster and more entertaining then it has been in over 25 years.
I'll go with your logic and say nothing but it would have done something to the oilers D.
Say you are playing a playoff series and you lose Gardiner in game one. Lose Dermott in game 3. The other team keeps their D in tact.
BTW fighters are not rats.