We shoe horned him onto the team, he was awful, the team played horrendously especially defensively and Polak's partner looked below replacement level about the same time Polak came back onto the team
I know your inclined towards managements view most of the time but for a coach who just said he picked his team on merit this is a joke and for a team that's trying to win games this is mind numbing
I have eyes, Polak was bad last season and he's worse now, that's some sort of bad
i'm not. i would have (have done, and will continue) to say this about the majority of players in this situation. if you had a bad injury, miss most of camp and most of the season you're going to look 'bad' if you're not an elite player or just incredibly lucky. Note, I didn't say you didn't have to like him or he's justified on being the team or anything like that - simply stated that a lot of people NOT named Polak would have the exact same issues and drag down the play due to having coming back to game speed. I didn't say you were
wrong or you didn't have eyes. But flipping duh he's worse now.
He MISSED. CAMP. AND SEVEN GAMES. and he's old and not fast anyway.
All I said was a little leeway in that regard would be nice. Which - quite frankly a majority of people here tend not to do - regarding most anything. (probably me too, so again i'm not holding myself above anyone).
I have never met a coach that says the exact same thing - building a team based on merit - yet doesn't have some sort of pet, or that player that makes utterly
no sense of why they are on the team, other than that's their pet, or they just trust him even though every metric says other wise. It's like complaining why the sky is blue and the sun rises in the east. It just is. And to say that then they shouldn't say it - well. that's a horse of a different colour and quite frankly I don't think it would change one thing or the other anyway.