I have a feeling this is a reward for past service with the Leafs and Jersey - give the a high visibility audition for 29 other teams.
When was signing a guy to a PTO even something you can criticize? I couldn't care less if they signed some of your grandmothers to a PTO, the worst that can happen is they get used as roster filler in split squad games for the road half....
I like Lou's stamp here.
Leafs released toughness in the organization pre-Lou and Lou signs an enforcer with the Marlies and opens the door for Fraser.
I guess some things just can't be captured in a ratio.
Maybe we won't be as soft as the red wings without the skill.
Liking Lou's vision already
He's only 28 still for god sake. He might be in the zone where past injuries are just that. His fitness level and health are possibly going to be better than a couple of years ago.
The devil's played him a average of 16:16 a game and his possession numbers would be interesting to see in this thread. He was basically a #6 dman for them.
I like him and might be coming into a stage of his career where he is simply poised and expierenced enough to overcome his lack of footspeed. His positional play was always fairly good in the past with us. Maybe he is even better now. We'll see. Cool with me inviting him.
This is a all Lou invite.
PTO's cost us little and if the player wins a spot, so much the better, if not, they can either sign with the Marlies, or another AHL team, or possibly with a European team, maybe even another NHL team
A shame that his vision is being wasted on Mark Freaking Fraser and an AHL plug likely to play in Florida for most of the year.
He better get his 'vision' checked.
AHL signing, if anything. The guy isn't a NHL defensemen and never will be.
Do you like the idea that all players will compete for ice time and that any position is earned or does that apply to just certain players?
A player is signed to a try out contract. People have been lauding Babcock and Lou as supreme leaders and judges of talent.
If Fraser earns a spot.. Wtf? Who is anyone here to criticize that??
Fraser - Polak third pair would not be a fun pairing to play against. Those two guys are tough as nails.
You're talking about vision and bringing in players that fits his vision (or 'stamp'). Nothing about those 2 moves shows vision or any sort of philosophy. They signed a depth AHL player and a PTO to a player desperate for work that perhaps could be useful if the current depth players regress or get beaten. What about the better players signed to PTO's like Boyes and Glencross? What kind of vision do we have here?
In my opinion, Fraser is a pretty terrible defender. Speaking of his recent travels and play, I tend to be right here. If this is the ace up Lou Lamoriello's sleeve... we're in trouble. And considering we're pretty much at the contract limit, wasting a contract spot for him to me is a pretty big waste.
I did say earlier that he'll have to play some of his best hockey to earn a contract, at least at the NHL level, or earn one because the competition is weak. If he earns the contract, then I'm fine with it. Either way, I'm fairly indifferent about Mark Fraser.
Fraser is from the Blackburn area, where I live and coach. His picture is framed up and displayed at the Blackburn arena. I do hope he can find a pro contract. I just don't think he's a good player, that's all.
Marcinin needs waivers...and to be honest i'd rather see what I have in Marcinin then what I already know Fraser is.
The vision is probably two fold. Find filler for the next couple of years so you don't burn a year of contract for the young guys.
And I suspect Lou won't want a team as soft as Detroit even when the rebuild is done.
Does he even fight and hit much anymore? he seemed like a ghost after he took that puck to the head