Damisoph
Registered User
- Jun 29, 2010
- 8,986
- 2,312
30? does anyone have that?, 28,29,30
Seeing #30 on a forward would be strange.
30? does anyone have that?, 28,29,30
grundy looks like hes a gamer.
– They (Leafs) like us and our organization, they don't have any problem with him (Grundström) staying another year.
Apparently, Kyle Dubas has been in talks with Frölunda GM (and former Leafs player) Fredrik Sjöström about Grundström. In a blog post, written by Frölunda beat writer Henrik Leman, Sjöström had this to say:
Source (in Swedish)
Makes sense. No harm in staying for another year and develop at home. We must keep in mind that a lot of these young players can look really good in short spells but it is really unrealistic to believe every one will be like Marner, Willy and Matthews.
Apparently, Kyle Dubas has been in talks with Frölunda GM (and former Leafs player) Fredrik Sjöström about Grundström. In a blog post, written by Frölunda beat writer Henrik Leman, Sjöström had this to say:
Source (in Swedish)
At least he won't be killed by that **** Dutchin in the AHL
Wait is Grundstrom going back to the SHL? Or is he spending next year in the AHL? Thought he was staying here.
Another year in Sweden means the Leafs get back that contract spot, correct?
I do not believe they will get it back. It will also not slide, seeing as he was signed in the same calendar year as he turned 20. That is why I am somewhat confused as to why they gave him an ELC if they weren't planning on him playing with the Marlies for this season.
To reward him for a solid season and ensure we keep his rights (although, it is highly unlikely he wouldn't be signed in 4 years). Frolunda has a solid track record, so if we decide it's best to give him a major role there, I'd trust the decision. Froluna is much more trust-worthy development-wise than Rogle, which is a tricky situation.I do not believe they will get it back. It will also not slide, seeing as he was signed in the same calendar year as he turned 20. That is why I am somewhat confused as to why they gave him an ELC if they weren't planning on him playing with the Marlies for this season.
I do not believe they will get it back. It will also not slide, seeing as he was signed in the same calendar year as he turned 20. That is why I am somewhat confused as to why they gave him an ELC if they weren't planning on him playing with the Marlies for this season.
To reward him for a solid season and ensure we keep his rights (although, it is highly unlikely he wouldn't be signed in 4 years). Frolunda has a solid track record, so if we decide it's best to give him a major role there, I'd trust the decision. Froluna is much more trust-worthy development-wise than Rogle, which is a tricky situation.
Are you certain? Because I thought they would...
"Reserve List" means the list of all Players to whom a Club has rights including
all Unsigned Draft Choices, all Players signed to an SPC (whether or not currently playing in the NHL), and all Players who have signed an SPC but who have subsequently been returned to Juniors. A Club may have on its Reserve List, at any one time, not more than 90 Players, which shall include the following:
(a) Not more than 50 Players signed to an SPC and not less than 24 Players and 3
goalkeepers under an SPC. Age 18 and age 19 Players who were returned to Juniors, and who have not played 11 NHL Games in one season, shall be exempt from inclusion in the 50 Player limit.
Any Club violating this provision shall be liable to loss of draft choices as determined by
the Commissioner.
(b) Unsigned Draft Choices.
I truly believe this guy will be a captain someday.
I hope not! I like the way he plays and what he brings but if he is a captain he wont be with the leafs, Matthews will be captain for a decade (fingers crossed)