TSN: Leafs and Ducks in serious discussion regarding Hampus Lindholm

[LucicAndChong]

LHD but extremely talented shutdown. Downside is hes got 2 years left and will be a UFA same time as Rielly.

Would cost sandin+1st+ robertson+1st atleast or maybe Nyalnder straight

This is prob one of those rumors that nothing comes from. Really doubt we trade for lindholm

Holy shit this might be the worst offer I’ve ever seen. That’s basically 4 1sts...

 

[Uncle Scrooge]

That makes zero sense for Anaheim

It makes sense for the Ducks to start exploring what they could get. 2 years goes by fast and unless Hampus really wants to stay in Anaheim/the re-tool isn't successful quickly then it's in the Ducks best interest to deal him.

I don't see these two teams making a trade right now by any stretch of imagination, but wouldn't be surprised to hear his name come up more and more.

 

[Big Daddy Cane]

Radio threads without a link to the original audio or at least a tweet from a reputable source (i.e. Account4Hockey and NHL_Watcher) shouldn't be allowed.

Too many do a poor job of transcribing what was said, including the tone.

 

[dracom]

It makes sense for the Ducks to start exploring what they could get. 2 years goes by fast and unless Hampus really wants to stay in Anaheim/the re-tool isn't successful quickly then it's in the Ducks best interest to deal him.

I don't see these two teams making a trade right now by any stretch of imagination, but wouldn't be surprised to hear his name come up more and more.

Successful teams dont trade away their best defenseman they’ve ever developed who is still only 26 years old. He’s the perfect kind of player to keep around for a rebuild until someone on the roster over takes his spot.

bad teams trade away talent for futures when they dont have an immediate replacement. Ducks aren’t gonna do that.

 

[PromisedLand]

Nylander+Sandin at the minimum. Even then it doesn't make a ton of sense for Anaheim unless they already have an idea that Hampus won't sign a new deal there.

Lindholm isn’t a top D in the League to fetch a price like that

 

[lwvs84]

I'm not sure there is a good deal to be made for the two teams. Ducks need top line drivers and top pair d-men... Lindholm is a top pair d-man and isn't old, he could be kept through the rebuild. Trading Lindholm for Nylander would be a bad move, same thing that happened to Rakell will happen to Nylander. There aren't star players here for other teams to focus on, Nylander would be the focus of other teams' defenses and his point totals would go down too.

 

[TopCheese]

Hoping it’s for Nylander + dermott with a grinding depth forward coming back to Toronto Such as deslauriers

 

[hamzarocks]

Holy shit this might be the worst offer I’ve ever seen. That’s basically 4 1sts...

Sorry it was a or not and loool. Either sandin+1st+ or Robertson+1st+

 

[Ryan52]

Radio threads without a link to the original audio or at least a tweet from a reputable source (i.e. Account4Hockey and NHL_Watcher) shouldn't be allowed.

Too many do a poor job of transcribing what was said, including the tone.

with the right tag placed on it, who cares? it is a discussion board after all

 

[TootooTrain]

- “TSN Radio”
- No time or people mentioned
- No other replies in thread

Doesn’t sound made up at all.

Close it up

 

[Voight]

Dermott + 1st wouldn't be too bad considering Lindholm is under contract for at least 2 seasons. But I don't know why the Ducks would move him?

 

[Adam da bomb]

Lindholm isn’t a top D in the League to fetch a price like that

If he was a Top D he'd be fetching more like a top forward plus unless that forward was a centre. A top D would fetch you a laine, Peterson, Marner, Svech, Point, not Nylander.

 

[TootooTrain]

with the right tag placed on it, who cares? it is a discussion board after all

A proposal for the sake of a proposal is fine.
Misleading a large group of people into thinking its a real tangible thing, taints the opinions you get from them if you switch from rumor to proposal.

 

[WhatTheDuck]

with the right tag placed on it, who cares? it is a discussion board after all

The price tag was utter garbage though.

Plus some of us want to discuss reality, there's a fantasy section if others want to indulge in that.

 

[Just A Bit Outside]

I heard a guy in the neighbouring stall at the public washroom say he thought this deal was shit.

Or maybe it was he was taking a shit.

Either way.

 

[Ryan52]

The price tag was utter garbage though.

Plus some of us want to discuss reality, there's a fantasy section if others want to indulge in that.

i mean the tsn tag

 

[WhatTheDuck]

Dermott + 1st wouldn't be too bad considering Lindholm is under contract for at least 2 seasons. But I don't know why the Ducks would move him?

It's horrendously bad

 

[TheGroceryStick]

They want Robertson

Dermott + Robertson







I'm just playing into the likely BS

 

[Big Daddy Cane]

with the right tag placed on it, who cares? it is a discussion board after all

Not everyone on here is interested in the fan idea threads. This is a glorified proposal thread, until proof is provided. The tags are there for a reason.

 

[Duck Off]

It makes sense for the Ducks to start exploring what they could get. 2 years goes by fast and unless Hampus really wants to stay in Anaheim/the re-tool isn't successful quickly then it's in the Ducks best interest to deal him.

I don't see these two teams making a trade right now by any stretch of imagination, but wouldn't be surprised to hear his name come up more and more.

It makes no sense because our stupid GM is adamant about competing sooner rather than later. Trading Hampus for futures, as the OP implies, hurts the team now more than any other move we could make (aside from trading Gibson).

 

[WhatTheDuck]

It makes no sense because our stupid GM is adamant about competing sooner rather than later. Trading Hampus for futures, as the OP implies, hurts the team now more than any other move we could make (aside from trading Gibson).

Hurts the team now and very low chance of ever making them better based on the offers here.

 

[ToDavid]

with the right tag placed on it, who cares? it is a discussion board after all

OP is free to make a proposal or speculation thread. Discussion board or not, why would we want threads with straight up BS in them? (not saying OP is lying, but if he is).

Tags are helpful for organization, but they shouldn’t be used to cover up untruthful or misleading posts.

 

[uncleben]

If anyone has got anything to back this up, feel free to message a mod, but I'm not seeing anything here.