ucanthanzalthetruth
#CatsAreCooked
- Jul 13, 2013
- 27,808
- 31,107
Last season I went to a Jets game in Sunrise and paid $22 to sit in the 8th row on the Blueline. $22 doesn't even get you into the MTS Centre, does it?
1. A friend of mine is a season-ticket holder with the Panthers, and he is not renewing. owing to the terrible customer service they are now offering.
2. The writing is on the wall ... Panthers to Quebec.
3. Some people have argued that Viola bought the Panthers for prestige. I call that wishful thinking. His purchase of the Panthers was a shrewd investment, and he is doing exactly what somebody who treats it as an investment would do: maximizing his return.
4. He has cut staff, in-game amenities, and is 5. clearly not interested in selling more season tickets. Rather, he sees an opportunity to sell it to Quebecor. 6. He bought it for $160 Million, probably lost in the range of $60M operating it, and is now going to sell it for $400M+. Doubling his investment in a couple of years is pretty good business.
I've taken the time to go through this post and mark everything wrong with it.
1. The Panthers have always had terrible customer service, as a former sther I can attest to this. The new regime has increased perks for current holders and is not increasing prices for existing holders as a reward for sticking with them
2. Before the vote takes place this is simply an outlandish statement
3/4. He cut staff because there was so much unnecessary fat. Someone who was fired by the team posted on this board saying this, and it was obvious. Paying people to do nothing isn't smart. In-game amenities are no different than in past years, so I'm not sure what your referring to?
5. "he is clearly not interested in selling more tickets" What proof of there is this? Sure there's been no increase in marketing this year but it's year 1 of the changes, I don't know how you can see it's clear.
6. The Atlanta Thrashers who were less in the red than Florida sold for 110 million, and the Panthers are going to sell for 400 million? precedent says this isn't true. And if this was going to be true, what on earth was Viner thinking selling, when he could have doubled his investment if he hung on for 2 more years?