UNITEDSTATESOFHOCKEY
Registered User
- Jan 5, 2018
- 360
- 146
What a story it would be if Jack Hughes also gets drafted by Vancouver.
They'd eclipse the Sedins.
How do you know that considering one is 19 and the other is 17?
What a story it would be if Jack Hughes also gets drafted by Vancouver.
They'd eclipse the Sedins.
How do you know that considering one is 19 and the other is 17?
How do you know that considering one is 19 and the other is 17?
What a story it would be if Jack Hughes also gets drafted by Vancouver.
They'd eclipse the Sedins.
I think on a balance of probabilities, there's a chance that the Hughes brothers could have more prosperous careers than the Sedins, but it's impossible to compare given that they play different positions and the Hughes brothers won't be making an impact in the NHL for a number of years.
If Jack has as good of a career as Henrik, and Quinn becomes a 50-60 point dman that drives the offensive breakout of the team, then they have a good case for being the best brother duo of the Canucks.
Yeah, when you combine the odds of 2 players reaching Hall of Fame status it makes the odds quite small. Then they'd also have to stay with the Canucks throughout there career or atleast til they are washed up.The balance of probabilities tells you that two 17 and 18 year old kids are going to eclipse the careers of 2 all star future hall of famers that have been the face of this franchise for the last decade?
Ok.
The balance of probabilities tells you that two 17 and 18 year old kids are going to eclipse the careers of 2 all star future hall of famers that have been the face of this franchise for the last decade?
Ok.
I said "there's a chance"...because there is a chance they do. While the Sedins had fantastic careers, they were late bloomers in that it wasn't until their 5th full season where they started to really produce like top 6 players, they retired at 37 (some players play until 40 or so, giving them more time to add to career points), they never won a Cup, and they were predominantly 75-80 point players (not a slight, just that other players can surpass that benchmark). For those reasons, along with the potential of the Hughes brothers, it's not outrageous to think they have a chance of having better careers than the Sedins. Not saying it's likely.
Sedins also played their entire careers with the Canucks though. And their prime was as good as anyone's. (Almost 10 years of ppg). Hughes bros may not be in van post 30 years old.
Only way that Hughes bros can pass Sedins if they bring a cup to Vancouver.
We better get Jack Hughes or I think Quinn Hughes leaves as a UFA first chance he gets to play with his brother.
We better get Jack Hughes or I think Quinn Hughes leaves as a UFA first chance he gets to play with his brother.
My major takeaways, he doesn't look that small, he isn't afraid to get physical, forecheckers have no chance against him, his acceleration is McDavid like. (Obviously McDavid has higher top speeds)I would recommend as a hockey fan, to watch this. I don't think I've seen a defencemen highlight reel like this before, he plays with such conviction.
We better get Jack Hughes or I think Quinn Hughes leaves as a UFA first chance he gets to play with his brother.
1 year. He didn't coach him as an U-17 (he replaced Tony Granato). Okay, Brian Burke was an NHL executive last year, and has won a cup, should I blindly accept what he says?
Your argument is that we should automatically defer to authority. Which is a bit ridiculous, because if I asked a bunch of the NHL scouting community if Quinn Hughes was generational, it would probably get an overwhelming no.
Because the word has been altered from what it historically meant. That's why I'll tell someone they are wrong. It has never been used in this context until post-McDavid, and it is getting ridiculous.
What a story it would be if Jack Hughes also gets drafted by Vancouver.
They'd eclipse the Sedins.
That is still an appeal to an authority. Because the guys position is being a former coach of Quinn Hughes, saying that he is right because he was his coach.Just because you have heard of the appeal to authority bias doesn' t mean you understand it.
He's saying the coach is an expert because he's watch Quinn Hughes play in a ton of games. Not because of his position FFS.
1 year. He didn't coach him as an U-17 (he replaced Tony Granato). Okay, Brian Burke was an NHL executive last year, and has won a cup, should I blindly accept what he says?
What a silly statement with zero thought in reality whatsoever.
Not sure what you mean by "eclipse". Most mainstream fans wouldn't even know the Hughes name until the 2nd seasons they both played, and suggesting they would "eclipse" them statistically is just absurd.
We better get Jack Hughes or I think Quinn Hughes leaves as a UFA first chance he gets to play with his brother.
First off who is "we" in this conversation?!?!
Secondly, If they wanted to play together so badly they would have found a way to get Jack into michigan this year... I haven't heard any evidence that they would hatch some scheme to play together 8 years down the road. What if one of them is on a perennial cup contending team with no cap space to bring in the other?!?
Third, there is another brother coming and while this is way way down the road, its trending like that all 3 would be 2-3 years apart on hitting free agency so it would take one of them signing a bridge deal or something weird down the road for those stars to align...