this is great...dougie hamilton, who played in every game this season, right? who was on pace for 10 goals as a rookie? who had less TOI than larsson? who helped his team make the playoffs?
lets stop kidding ourselves. if boston needed the help right now, DH would be in. they dont, so he isnt. pretty simple.
for the dramatic, i have to say that i'm not saying hamilton will turn out better than larsson- but right now its not really close.
How exactly is it "not even close"?
If we're comparing rookie seasons, Hamilton had 16 points in 42 games, Larsson had 18 points in 65 games. Not sure there's enough of a difference there to definitively determine anything, especially when you consider Hamilton was paired with a d-man that's capable of offensive production that our entire defense struggles to combine for, some seasons.
Also, Larsson averaged 20+ minutes of TOI last season. Hamilton averaged 17:08. Sure, it serves the "Hamilton had more points averaging less minutes" argument, but Larsson's ATOI proves his ability in his own zone. Some games last season, Larsson logged over 26 minutes. That's amazing for a rookie d-man playing on a veteran defense. He was averaging about 22-23 minutes for the first 27 games of his NHL career. Hamilton went over 20 minutes in 4 games this year. Many games he had about 13 minutes. Larsson played less than 14 minutes twice in his rookie season.
If you want to focus on Larsson THIS season, he was playing on a team that simply wasn't as good as the Boston team Hamilton is playing on, as evidenced by what is happening in the playoffs right now and that our season ended over a month ago. We were 28th in GF this season, Boston was 14th. We were 13th in GA this season, Boston was 3rd. Our situation on defense deserves to be considered when analyzing Larsson's season, as well.
It's not outlandish to suggest that considering the entire situation this season, Hamilton may not have played more than 15-20 games for the Devils. Therefore, it's pointless to compare the two players.