Circulartheory
Registered User
Great, see if you can't sign him. But guys like him tend to become free agents that you can find easily.
Not according to the news article that had him in high demand during the 2013 season. Sounded like he was going to get selected by another team in the midrounds, if not by the Wild.
Great, you projected him as a 4th rounder. I projected him in the top 60. The fact is, we need offensive players, guys with speed and a great shot. We don't have a lot of guys like that. Who knows, he could bulk up easily.
You projected him in the top 60 based on what? The fact is, we did need offensive players but I debate whether that means drafted high risk players that struggled outside of 2-on-1 rushes. The risk seems a bit too much in terms of the reward.
This argument will revert to the ol' safe vs risk pick debate but I will say Bjorkstrand fell to the latter of the 3rd round for very good reason. Its not like NHL teams forget he was still available.
Our leading scorer in the AHL? Was a defenseman that we just traded. We don't have much depth here.
Like I said, I look at depth in terms of the overall Wild picture, not just who is in the AHL and juniors. I also consider young players in the NHL and I urge others to do the same. Future is our future, the only time that changes is when the benefits of being a "future" expires, and those benefits is mainly the luxury of cheap, easily negotiable ELCs.
Meaning, that includes Granlund, Brodin, Coyle, Zucker, Niederreiter, Kuemper, Dumba etc.
While I agree we may need more goal-scoring ability, I still think our depth is still quite strong. Drafting Gabriel in favor of another high risk prospect certainly has not destroyed the columns holding up our prospect pool.