VoluntaryDom
Formerly DominicBoltsFan / Ⓐ / ✞
that third line grinder who leads the NHL in p1/60 this seasonPoint’s a pretty decent 3rd line grinder. He & Landy would fit together nicely.
that third line grinder who leads the NHL in p1/60 this seasonPoint’s a pretty decent 3rd line grinder. He & Landy would fit together nicely.
Psh, please. He belongs on a line with Rantanen.that third line grinder who leads the NHL in p1/60 this season
funny thing is last i checked rantanen's p1/60 WITH mackinnon (1.74) is less than steven stamkos' WITHOUT kucherov (1.9) in the span since the start of last season. rantanen without mackinnon drops to a 1.24 p1/60, unsurprisingly a 2nd line number.Psh, please. He belongs on a line with Rantanen.
NUH UH! Point > Mikko, obvifunny thing is last i checked rantanen's p1/60 WITH mackinnon (1.74) is less than steven stamkos' WITHOUT kucherov (1.9) in the span since the start of last season. rantanen without mackinnon drops to a 1.24 p1/60, unsurprisingly a 2nd line number.
point is at 2.28 p1/60 in that span lolNUH UH! Point > Mikko, obvi
Kucherov has one more elite season than Mac in 16/17. Prior to that, their PPGs over the previous three years were .71 and .70.
That Mac has hit his prime one year later than Kucherov is the only difference. That Mac has reached Kucherov's level at an earlier age than Kucherov can be viewed as significant enough to overlook Kucherov's one more elite season.
Kucherov is the more proven playoff performer but Mac has a rep as a big game player even before coming into the NHL and is off to a good start with a playoff PPG of 1.23.
You're a troll dude. Stop.point is at 2.28 p1/60 in that span lol
Sigh... reputation? doing something at a younger age? Point is that Kucherov has done more and the question asked who is better, not who you think will be better in 3 to 5 years.