that's if we assume that scoring points determines how good season defenseman had.
i think kronwall was slightly at fault for the bad powerplay.
My point is Lindholm's demonstrated ceiling hasn't even touched the floor of Kronwall's offensive production... as an old man... with a broken knee. So while scoring points isn't the be all and end all, the difference in offensive skill is very clear.
Also, many pundits had Detroit with the worst defense of any playoff team. How much better would he look with a legit supporting cast?
With superior offensive skill and support from burners like Klingberg, Karlsson, OEL etc. I think he would have been solid. Probably even their top LH PP guy. For example, he has looked good in brief stints with our most mobile Dman (Smith).
Look, I'm not trying to argue that he is a bonafide number 1 on any NHL team but he has a very high skill set. He is a legit pp guy and comfortable number 3. If his training can extract even a little more mobility, he will be suitable as a short term 1st pairing guy.
Either way, for Detroit's sake, Skipping the World Cup is probably best.
Kronwall was not going to point PP on Swedish team. They have some better options... just guess who. He was there to be at secondary shut-down pair behind Hedman.
I kind of alluded to this above, but all their top guys are RHed. Its irrelevant now, but I suspect Kronwall would have got his pp time.
Tongue-in-cheek: The"Swedish House Mafia" would have made sure Kronwall got his minutes. According to some, the only reason Ericsson wasn't scratched was because of Zetterberg's pull.