Who's more responsible for this season, Quick and the other goalies or the skaters?
It's only 12% of the 11 year deal he signed.
If Jeff Carter is worth $20 mill is it really worth it to play three seasons somewhere he doesn't want to be for another 4 after taxes? It might not be.
It's only 12% of the 11 year deal he signed.
If Jeff Carter is worth $20 mill is it really worth it to play three seasons somewhere he doesn't want to be for another 4 after taxes? It might not be.
Who's more responsible for this season, Quick and the other goalies or the skaters?
Who's more responsible for this season, Quick and the other goalies or the skaters?
I would be VERY surprised if he was willing to walk away from 20% of his total worth in your model there.These guys might be millionaires, but 4 million is nothing to sneeze at, especially not for 2-3 years work.It's only 12% of the 11 year deal he signed.
If Jeff Carter is worth $20 mill is it really worth it to play three seasons somewhere he doesn't want to be for another 4 after taxes? It might not be.
I would be VERY surprised if he was willing to walk away from 20% of his total worth in your model there.These guys might be millionaires, but 4 million is nothing to sneeze at, especially not for 2-3 years work.
Who's more responsible for this season, Quick and the other goalies or the skaters?
I don't think anyone is saying Carter COULDN'T retire and live comfortably. I just don't think it's likely that he walks away from another 7 million dollars, whatever that ends up being after agent fees and taxes. I didn't realize I'm the only person posting here that doesn't wipe his ass with $1,000 bills.Jeff Carter - CapFriendly - NHL Salary Caps
Carters career earnings is projected to be $75.8m.
By the end of this season, he will have been paid around $68m of that.
He could retire at any point easily.
Thinking about scenarios where Carter is traded with less incentive to retire would include states with a lower tax burden than CA. Hello Dallas Stars and Florida Panthers.
Why all this talk of possibly trading Carter? He's one of the few contracts that DL got right.
He closes out his 3 years (starting next year) with salary of $3m, 2, and 2.
?? what am I missing? (besides a few more goals!!!)
Why all this talk of possibly trading Carter? He's one of the few contracts that DL got right.
He closes out his 3 years (starting next year) with salary of $3m, 2, and 2.
?? what am I missing? (besides a few more goals!!!)
Blake and Luc can't blame DL for this disaster, this one is solely on them. A fair and reasonable evaluation of the team in the summer of 2017 should have shown that they were done contending and they had an excellent older player to deal for future assets, instead Luc and Blake thought they were contenders and will end up getting pennies on the dollar for Carter because of the injury.
The Lucic trade and the failure to trade Carter at the right time, just look at the wasted assets with those decisions.
Blake and Luc can't blame DL for this disaster, this one is solely on them. A fair and reasonable evaluation of the team in the summer of 2017 should have shown that they were done contending and they had an excellent older player to deal for future assets, instead Luc and Blake thought they were contenders and will end up getting pennies on the dollar for Carter because of the injury.
The Lucic trade and the failure to trade Carter at the right time, just look at the wasted assets with those decisions.
32 years old, with 5 years left on his contract when Blake got the job. If you go to NHL trades for 2017-18 - NHL Trade Tracker, there aren't many guys that old, that many guys with that long of a contract, and especially guys that are that old with that long of a contract, getting traded in the in the summer of 2017. Maybe Blake made a fair and reasonable evaluation, and there wasn't anything out there to do. Maybe there were no assets out there for Carter. Maybe other GMs looked at Carter at 32 with 5 years left and said, hmmm, what if that guy gets hurt? What am I willing to give up for that risk? We can say the Kings should be willing to retain 50% to make any deal happen because they're not going to win anyway, but just to use the league wide example again, how many teams are retaining that much on multi-year contracts? If there are any, it's very few. If the Kings were to do it, fine, but nobody should expect that sort of thing.
Of course it's also possible that Blake did not make a fair and reasonable evaluation, missed on or didn't even know about some great offer that was out there, and we're left with watching whatever is left of Carter.
Part of me feels bad for Blake because he really did take over a pretty hopeless situation, I mean with Pearson flaming out and Toffoli not far behind it's almost unbelievable to look at how crappy the Kings drafted from 2009-2016, there is literally not a single top 6 forward or top 4 d-man drafted and developed on the team from that time frame. But Rob has done very little to improve the situation, he seems to have just co-signed the strategy Lombardi was employing in his final 3 seasons.
Really, really, really needed to go outside the organization with the GM and coach hires after DL and DS were fired.
Iafallo? Brickley, Rempal? Petersen? Granted Brickley and Rempal aren't regular NHLers yet, Rob has done a decent job signing College FA's.
Also Rob was just hired 1.5 years ago, not even close to enough time to drastically improve the situation after the good year the team had last year, not out of the realm management thought they had another two years left in this core. Now Rob is reassessing and will make moves accordingly by trimming some of the fat off.
Brickley was a top College FA last year and Rempal was decently touted and was just named AHL rookie of the month, not fair to call them just depth yet.I am all for signing more college players, the NCAA was largely ignored by the former regime. But signing a bunch of depth NCAA guys is not really going to do much for the big picture.