vorky
@vorkywh24
- Jan 23, 2010
- 11,413
- 1,273
Actually, it is 2 goals & 2 assists for Cehlárik2 goals and 1 help for Peter Cehlarik...not a bad start.
Anyone watch the game shed some feedback?
Actually, it is 2 goals & 2 assists for Cehlárik2 goals and 1 help for Peter Cehlarik...not a bad start.
Anyone watch the game shed some feedback?
Actually, it is 2 goals & 2 assists for Cehlárik
as a first line center? REALLY? They couldn't go for someone like Ceglarik? To me Walstrom makes a lot more sense than Nordstrom.Well Nordstrom thing, for one, makes sense. Nobody plays 8 years in the NHL for no reason.
24 to go...He is, however, playing for Severstal on a down year so 25 points would be a good result.
1/3 surnames correct, that's a start, I guessas a first line center? REALLY? They couldn't go for someone like Ceglarik? To me Walstrom makes a lot more sense than Nordstrom.
24 to go...
1/3 surnames correct, that's a start, I guess
Cehlarik isn't some kind of superstar just because he scored 4 points in his debut game. I don't know how the guy who spent 8 years in the NHL is all of the sudden considered worse than the guy who didn't make it at all and scored 0,8 PPG in the SHL, was 3rd on his SHL team in scoring and got outscored by Hrivik whom we do know as a fairly unspectacular player from his Vityaz days. I don't really understand why do you hate this Nordstrom signing so much while praising getting someone like Cehlarik who is, by all means, a fairly mediocre European pro. It just seems like "the other kid's toys are shinier than mine" kind of thing.
Regarding Wallmark, his ceiling should ultimately be higher, I agree, but many coaches prefer to play those defensive centers in the close games between two big teams as much as possible, that's not exactly news. That's why Andronov or Kamenev constantly get to play more than Vey, for example.
That's a good start but seriously, playing with Guslistov and Geraskin he's not going to get to 30..
Shouldn't you at least wait for him to deliver then? Because the way I see it, many guys were expected to deliver and didn't. He's no sure thing.Cehlarik was expected to deliver in the KHL
And what's wrong with Guslistov and Geraskin? both are solid hockey players.
Geraskin is very talented, his issue is size.Shouldn't you at least wait for him to deliver then? Because the way I see it, many guys were expected to deliver and didn't. He's no sure thing.
Regarding Guslistov and Geraskin, define "solid". Yeah, they are good for ~20 points, that was kind of the point.
Geraskin is very talented, his issue is size.
I agree in general on Cehlarik, but he almost made the bruins, certainly got plenty chances, he is just tad bit not good enough. This translates (usually) well in the KHL.
Norsdtrom in Boston almost never played center is a defensive specialist pk guy. These guys usually just translate into much of the same, no matter the level (pro of course)
Actually, it is 2 goals & 2 assists for Cehlárik
Didn't see the game but the shot clock shows 36-18 in Amur's favor, couldn't have been that bad.Amur looked awful against Sochi.
Didn't see the game but the shot clock shows 36-18 in Amur's favor, couldn't have been that bad.
Explains the roster quality, probably that's where the salary budget wentOne other note from yesterday. I watched a bit of the SKA-Severstal game, and noticed that they must have done a major upgrade on the arena lighting. Was nice watching a game that didn't look like it was being played in a dungeon.
Explains the roster quality, probably that's where the salary budget went
Lighting up our rookie goalie who looked really shaky, but that's okay. Hey, our coach does not knoe how to spell defence.Team China is on fire, leading 4:3 against Kazan