hatcher
Registered User
You guys are gonna be hard to beat now. Two way hockey is needed and you'll be coached it now. Great move Dallas.
On what basis is Sutter more obsessed with size than Hitch? Did the Kings specifically trade for a bigger body to fulfill Sutter's demand for size or did he coach what already existed? Were the Blues any smaller than the Kings? Petro, Parayko, Bouwmeester, Backes, Reaves, Berglund, Brodziak,...heck they even dealt the relativey smaller Oshie for a much bigger Troy Brouwer. We have size too, but not being used effectively offensively, which is what Sutter had the Kings doing and won them 2 cups.
Kings goal scoring has suffered because of reasons not limited to Voynov's canning, Williams leaving, and Brown, Gaborik, and even Kopitar not being able to offensively ignite after their extensions.
A big reason why I am not for Hitchcock because it's a short-term fix and not a.long-term one, and has Nill trying to save his job written all over it. This is much like Hicks parading Nieuwendyk with a "Look, it's Mr.1999!!" to save his face and the fanbase yearning for glory ate that up. Yeah, Hitchcock will get us in the playoffs for a couple of seasons that he is coach, but you will likely see this team just as stagnant as the Blues are. Again, I don't mind eating crow if I am wrong, but that's my assessment for now.
You guys are gonna be hard to beat now. Two way hockey is needed and you'll be coached it now. Great move Dallas.
There seems to be a lot of overlap between "big problems the Stars have" and "areas of Hitch's expertise."
Maybe that would be the case if we had some depth up front, on the blueline, or in net.
I agree (except about our forward depth...it's fine), and I think those moves are coming.
I don't think we'll be breaking the piggy bank in the offseason to bring on a top 6 forward...I can tell you that.
Can't imagine this makes Nichushkin eager to come back... Some stronger defensive fundamentals overall being instilled could be good, and Hitchcock is only a year removed from taking the Blues to the Conference finals. But my knee jerk reaction when I saw the news this morning was like a lot of people here, "ugh"
If having a coach who expects effort is a deal breaker for Nichushkin, he might as well never leave the KHL.
I said that mostly in jest, meant it more in terms of Hitchcock's history with Russian forwards, most recently Tarasenko. http://www.stlouisgametime.com/2011/11/11/2554392/ken-hitchcock-and-playing-russian-roulette
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHQfpSPOonM
My thinking is we are about to shed Hemsky, Sharp, Hudler, and possibly another forward via expansion. As it stands we are pretty lean once you get past our 3rd best forward.
I see where you're coming from. It will be less deep upfront more than likely.
I do think Hemsky is coming back.
Add A HEALTHY Janmark back into the fray (hopefully), and it looks better.
I think Shore plays a bigger role next season, and Dickinson enters the scene full-time...maybe Smith as well. Gurianov could easily have a breakout season and be an impact player for us as well.
I think we're relatively good cap-wise right now, so if we needed to bring on another cost-controlled 2nd line forward it'd be doable...Anyone know how our cap looks going into next season?
Yeah I hope we make some moves and guys are healthy, but things are just in the air.
About 23m in space plus possibly 2m increase. Lindell Ritchie Faksa Janmark need new deals, maybe 8m total? Need a 3-4m forward I'd say to round things out in addition to new goalie and new defenseman. Getting those done with the 12m left is doable for sure.