Buy the kid out, bring him to camp. If he can play, play him.
The days of stupid hierarchy and vets over kids should be all over now.
he definitely should come to camp but send him back to KalPa if he isn't ready.
Buy the kid out, bring him to camp. If he can play, play him.
The days of stupid hierarchy and vets over kids should be all over now.
Buy the kid out, bring him to camp. If he can play, play him.
The days of stupid hierarchy and vets over kids should be all over now.
For what it's worth, that squad had a truly clueless coach who had no idea how to organize a game and utilize what he had.I'm guessing his performance in the last U18 world championship didn't help.
any idea on why he fell a little?
I'm guessing his performance in the last U18 world championship didn't help.
Why rush the kid?
Haha, no kidding.
I remember his dad as a rookie.
I like the pick. Cool name too.
Why rush the kid?
For you knuckleheads saying "OMG we should never trade that Pick unless we're getting Jesus on skates!", this is WHY it doesn't matter what you trade a 20+ pick in the 1st round (not that much anyway). This kid is a long-shot to become a skill player in this league IMO. MUCH better to give the pick away and get a proven player, even if you have to give another decent asset to do it. The only time that's not true is when drafting in the top 10 or the player coming back is older.
And WTF is it with Penguins Scouts drafting former players' sons... as if they will magically inherit all the father's skills and success?
For you knuckleheads saying "OMG we should never trade that Pick unless we're getting Jesus on skates!", this is WHY it doesn't matter what you trade a 20+ pick in the 1st round (not that much anyway). This kid is a long-shot to become a skill player in this league IMO. MUCH better to give the pick away and get a proven player, even if you have to give another decent asset to do it. The only time that's not true is when drafting in the top 10 or the player coming back is older.
And WTF is it with Penguins Scouts drafting former players' sons... as if they will magically inherit all the father's skills and success? This organization gets more joke-like by the year.
All teams do it, because players kids are often pretty good hockey players themselves. Imagine that.
What are you babbling about? Kapanen was the 10th-best prospect according to The Hockey News. He was the BPA according to McKenzie.
For you knuckleheads saying "OMG we should never trade that Pick unless we're getting Jesus on skates!", this is WHY it doesn't matter what you trade a 20+ pick in the 1st round (not that much anyway). This kid is a long-shot to become a skill player in this league IMO. MUCH better to give the pick away and get a proven player, even if you have to give another decent asset to do it. The only time that's not true is when drafting in the top 10 or the player coming back is older.
And WTF is it with Penguins Scouts drafting former players' sons... as if they will magically inherit all the father's skills and success?
Heyyyyy... didn't Kapanen play for... yah, that's right. Rutherford you're having a banner ****ing day my friend.
Good job, Dave!
For what it's worth, that squad had a truly clueless coach who had no idea how to organize a game and utilize what he had.
I see the Pens don't have plenty players like him waiting in the minors, so he's going to hit a spot for you guys in a year or two.
Make sure you have a driver tonight.
And WTF is it with Penguins Scouts drafting former players' sons... as if they will magically inherit all the father's skills and success?
See my response to Jags. Less about the player than what trading the pick could've done for us. Especially in light of the Neal CLUSTER ****.
Wow DV, you could not possibly more off the mark on your thoughts here. Kapanen was a consensus steal.
As someone who has actually seen him play I say he's legitimate all the way. But hey, if you want to think it's nothing but nepotism then that's your problem. I guess Paul Stastny must suck and these Reinhart kids were only drafted because of their dad.