Value of: Kappanen for Jenner
- Thread starter Amadeus
- Start date
CBJWerenski8
Formerly CBJWennberg10 (RIP Kivi)
- Jun 13, 2009
- 42,340
- 24,267
Pass. We need more centers not less. Plus we have a ton of RW's.
Michael HOMERUNing
Registered User
- Feb 24, 2019
- 2,497
- 2,373
Mitch nylander
One of the biggest fans from a bipolar fanbase
- Jun 2, 2016
- 4,488
- 5,858
Pass.
Doesn't make much sense from a value perspective. Kapanen fits well with our team, is great on both ends of the ice, and in my opinion is a more valuable piece then Jenner.
Meanwhile, as a poster above stated, it doesn't make sense to trade a center for a RW when they have Atkinson, Anderson, Bjorkstrand, Bemstrom, Robinson on the right.
If anything a deal that makes most sense on both sides would be Kerfoot + for Nuutivara/Savard
Doesn't make much sense from a value perspective. Kapanen fits well with our team, is great on both ends of the ice, and in my opinion is a more valuable piece then Jenner.
Meanwhile, as a poster above stated, it doesn't make sense to trade a center for a RW when they have Atkinson, Anderson, Bjorkstrand, Bemstrom, Robinson on the right.
If anything a deal that makes most sense on both sides would be Kerfoot + for Nuutivara/Savard
Cotton
Registered User
- May 13, 2013
- 9,120
- 5,611
He makes 3.7M and has 17pts.
Here's a name, Jordan Greenway, 6'6 230, 19pts and is an RFA.
We already drafted his brother J.D Greenway.
Morgs
#16 #34 #44 #88 #91
inthe6ix
Registered User
Cotton
Registered User
- May 13, 2013
- 9,120
- 5,611
Neither are Kapanen and Jenner, but at the right price everyone is available. And GM's don't have the emotional attachment fans do.
Granted, and I won't claim Greenway's not in the mix along with Zucker, Foligno and Donato to be shipped out before next season. He'd just be at the bottom of the list for me for entirely unemotional reasons.
Fro
Cheatin on CBJ w TBL
biturbo19
Registered User
- Jul 13, 2010
- 25,671
- 10,665
I feel like this doesn't actually many any sense for either team. One of those special trades that both sides reject because this helps nobody.
Liferleafer
TSN Scrum Lurker
- Feb 9, 2011
- 39,848
- 13,005
You realize you add zero value to these boards with stupid comments like that, and make your fanbase look bad?
WannabeFinn
Beloved One
Doesn’t make sense for Columbus. We need to add a viable top 6 C, especially with Wennberg on IR. Trading away Jenner would decimate our center depth behind Dubois.
Halla
Registered User
- Jan 28, 2016
- 14,727
- 3,779
and his production doesnt come close to matching his salary. 8g/17pts thus far? gross
WannabeFinn
Beloved One
He is. But with Wennberg (and Texier) on IR, he is our best option at 2/3C. If we were to keep Jenner on the wing, who would we move up? Riley Nash?!
Crede777
Deputized
- Dec 16, 2009
- 14,642
- 4,165
Value favors the Jackets but right now they have Dubois and Nash at center with Ryan MacInnis called up in Wennberg's absence. Otherwise, it is Jenner at center and that's about it. Texier may be a center in the future but right now Torts doesn't trust him enough at center and he is injured anyways.
When healthy, the Jackets only have 3 centers with Jenner being the fourth (and best faceoff man).
When healthy, the Jackets only have 3 centers with Jenner being the fourth (and best faceoff man).
Paris in Flames
Registered User
- Feb 4, 2009
- 15,903
- 7,935
And I would argue that if the Leafs are moving Kapanen it's for help on the backend and not another forward.
So....seems this trade doesn't really make sense for either team.
Viqsi
"that chick from Ohio"
Kerfoot is closer to our needs, but I'm not really sold on him being worth us giving up one of our existing centers.
